Targeted cryoablation of the prostate: 7-year outcomes in the primary treatment of prostate cancer

被引:198
作者
Bahn, DK
Lee, F
Badalament, R
Kumar, A
Greski, J
Chernick, M
机构
[1] Huron Valley Sinai Hosp, Karmanos Canc Inst, Commerce Township, MI USA
[2] Crittenton Hosp, Dept Surg, Rochester, MI USA
[3] Novo Nordisk Pharmaceut Inc, Princeton, NJ USA
[4] Community Mem Hosp, Prostate Inst Amer, Ventura, CA 93003 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01678-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The efficacy and safety of the long-term experience with targeted cryoablation of prostate cancer (TCAP) at a community hospital is retrospectively reviewed. A series of 590 consecutive patients who underwent TCAP as primary therapy with curative intent for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer from March 1993 to September 2001 were identified. Patients were stratified into 3 risk groups according to clinical characteristics. Biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS), post-TCAP biopsy results, and post-TCAP morbidity were calculated and presented. The mean follow-up time for all patients was 5.43 years. The percentages of patients in the low-, medium-, and high-risk groups were 15.9%, 30.3%, and 53.7%, respectively. Using a prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based definition of biochemical failure of 0.5 ng/mL, results were as follows: (1) the 7-year actuarial bDFS for low-, medium-, and high-risk patients were 61%, 68%, and 61%, respectively; (2) the bDFS probabilities for a PSA cutoff of 1.0 ng/mL for low-, medium-, and high-risk patients were 87%, 79%, and 71%, respectively; and (3) the bDFS probabilities for low-, medium-, and high-risk patients using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) definition of biochemical failure (3 successive increases of PSA level) were 92%, 89%, and 89%, respectively. The rate of positive biopsy was 13%. After a positive biopsy, 32 patients underwent repeat cryoablation. For those patients who underwent repeat cryoablation, 68%, 72%, and 91% remain bDFS using definitions of 0.5 ng/mL, 1.0 ng/mL, and the ASTRO criteria, respectively, after a mean follow-up time since repeat cryoablation of 63 months. The rates of morbidity were modest, and no serious complications were observed. TCAP was shown to equal or surpass the outcome data of external-beam radiation, 3-dimensional conformal radiation, and brachytherapy. These 7-year outcome data provide compelling validation of TCAP as an efficacious treatment modality for locally confined and locally advanced prostatic carcinoma.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 11
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] The role of free prostate-specific antigen in the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Akdas, A
    Cevik, I
    Tarcan, T
    Turkeri, L
    Dalaman, G
    Emerk, K
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 79 (06): : 920 - 923
  • [2] Radical prostatectomy versus brachytherapy for early-stage prostate cancer
    Alexianu, M
    Weiss, GH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2000, 14 (04) : 325 - 328
  • [3] *AM COLL PHYS, 1994, ANN INTERN MED, V126, P480
  • [4] BABAIAN RJ, 1995, CANCER, V75, P2153, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950415)75:8<2153::AID-CNCR2820750819>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-G
  • [6] BAHN DK, 1999, ACTA UROL ITAL, V13, P143
  • [7] Rectal protection during prostate cryosurgery: Design and characterization of an insulating probe
    Bischof, JC
    Merry, N
    Hulbert, J
    [J]. CRYOBIOLOGY, 1997, 34 (01) : 80 - 92
  • [8] CRYOSURGERY IN PROSTATIC-CANCER - ELIMINATION OF LOCAL LESION
    BONNEY, WW
    FALLON, B
    GERBER, WL
    HAWTREY, CE
    LOENING, SA
    NARAYANA, AS
    PLATZ, CE
    ROSE, EF
    SALL, JC
    SCHMIDT, JD
    CULP, DA
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1983, 22 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [9] Stage T3 prostate cancer: A nonrandomized comparison between definitive irradiation and induction hormonal manipulation plus prostatectomy
    Corn, BW
    Valicenti, RK
    Mulholland, SG
    Hyslop, T
    Gomella, L
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1998, 51 (05) : 782 - 787
  • [10] Percent free prostate-specific antigen after radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Crook, JM
    Bunting, PS
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (01) : 100 - 105