The effect of leg alignment on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement

被引:89
作者
Gulati, A.
Pandit, H.
Jenkins, C. [1 ]
Chau, R.
Dodd, C. A. F. [1 ]
Murray, D. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaed Ctr, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Surg, Botnar Res Ctr, Oxford OX3 7LD, England
来源
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME | 2009年 / 91B卷 / 04期
关键词
MINIMALLY-INVASIVE APPROACH; FOLLOW-UP; POSTOPERATIVE ALIGNMENT; ARTHROPLASTY; SURVIVAL; COMPONENTS; RETRIEVAL; MOTION; SERIES; RANGE;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.91B4.22105
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Varus malalignment after total knee replacement is associated with a poor outcome. Our aim was to determine whether the same was true for medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). The anatomical leg alignment was measured prospectively using a long-arm goniometer in 160 knees with an Oxford UKR. Patients were then grouped according to their mechanical leg alignment as neutral (5 to 10 of valgus), mild varus (0 to 4 of valgus) and marked varus (> 0 of varus). The groups were compared at five years in terms of absolute and change in the Oxford Knee score, American Knee Society score and the incidence of radiolucent lines. Post-operatively, 29 (18%) patients had mild varus and 13 (8%) had marked varus. The mean American Knee Society score worsened significantly (p < 0.001) with increasing varus. This difference disappeared if a three-point deduction for each degree of malalignment was removed. No other score deteriorated with increasing varus, and the frequency of occurrence of radiolucent lines was the same in each group. We therefore conclude that after Oxford UKR, about 25% of patients have varus alignment, but that this does not compromise their clinical or radiological outcome. Following UKR the deductions for malalignment in the American Knee Society score are not justified.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 474
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
ANOUCHI YS, 1996, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V331, P87
[2]
BARRETT WP, 1987, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V69A, P1328
[3]
Berger RA., 1999, Clin Orthop Relat Res, V367, P50
[4]
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery - 10-year minimum follow-up period [J].
Cartier, P ;
Sanouiller, JL ;
Grelsamer, RP .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1996, 11 (07) :782-788
[5]
COLLIER JP, 1991, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V273, P232
[6]
Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement [J].
Dawson, J ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Murray, D ;
Carr, A .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1998, 80B (01) :63-69
[7]
Translation and validation of the Oxford-12 item knee score for use in Sweden [J].
Dunbar, MJ ;
Robertsson, O ;
Ryd, L ;
Lidgren, I .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 71 (03) :268-274
[8]
EMERSON RH, 2007, CLIN ORTHOP S, V50, P32
[9]
Goodfellow J, 2006, UNICOMPARTMENTAL ART, P117
[10]
Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty [J].
Hernigou, P ;
Deschamps, G .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (423) :161-165