The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for predicting outcome in patients with severe sepsis and evidence of hypoperfusion at the time of emergency department presentation

被引:507
作者
Jones, Alan E. [1 ]
Trzeciak, Stephen [2 ]
Kline, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Charlotte, NC 28203 USA
[2] Cooper Univ Hosp, UMDNJ Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch Camden, Dept Emergency Med, Div Crit Care Med, Camden, NJ USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
sepsis; severe sepsis; scoring system; Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; mortality; GOAL-DIRECTED THERAPY; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; MEDS SCORE; SOFA SCORE; HYPOTENSION; VALIDATION; PERFORMANCE; DYSFUNCTION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819def97
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: Organ failure worsens outcome in sepsis. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score numerically quantifies the number and severity of failed organs. We examined the utility of the SOFA score for assessing outcome of patients with severe sepsis with evidence of hypoperfusion at the time of emergency department (ED) presentation. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Urban, tertiary ED with an annual census of > 110,000. Patients: ED patients with severe sepsis with evidence of hypoperfusion. Inclusion criteria: suspected infection, two or more criteria of systemic inflammation, and either systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg after a fluid bolus or lactate >= 4 mmol/L. Exclusion criteria: age <18 years or need for immediate surgery. Interventions: SOFA scores were calculated at ED recognition (T0) and 72 hours after intensive care unit admission (T72). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the predictive ability of SOFA scores at each time point. The relationship between A SOFA (change in SOFA from T0 to T72) was examined for linearity. Results: A total of 248 subjects aged 57 16 years, 48% men, were enrolled over 2 years. All patients were treated with a standardized quantitative resuscitation protocol; the in-hospital mortality rate was 21%. The mean SOFA score at TO was 7.1 +/- 3.6 points and at T72 was 7.4 +/- 4.9 points. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of SOFA for predicting in-hospital mortality at TO was 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.68-0.83) and at T72 was 0.84 (95% confidence. interval 0.77-0.90). The Delta SOFA was found to have a positive relationship with in-hospital mortality. Conclusions: The SOFA score provides potentially valuable prognostic information on in-hospital survival when applied to patients with severe sepsis with evidence of hypoperfusion at the time of ED presentation. (Crit Care Med 2009; 37:1649-1654)
引用
收藏
页码:1649 / 1654
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care
    Angus, DC
    Linde-Zwirble, WT
    Lidicker, J
    Clermont, G
    Carcillo, J
    Pinsky, MR
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (07) : 1303 - 1310
  • [2] Armitage P., 2001, STAT METHODS MED RES, V4th
  • [3] DEFINITIONS FOR SEPSIS AND ORGAN FAILURE AND GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF INNOVATIVE THERAPIES IN SEPSIS
    BONE, RC
    BALK, RA
    CERRA, FB
    DELLINGER, RP
    FEIN, AM
    KNAUS, WA
    SCHEIN, RMH
    SIBBALD, WJ
    [J]. CHEST, 1992, 101 (06) : 1644 - 1655
  • [4] Rapid increase in hospitalization and mortality rates for severe sepsis in the United States: A trend analysis from 1993 to 2003
    Dombrovskiy, Viktor Y.
    Martin, Andrew A.
    Sunderram, Jagadeeshan
    Paz, Harold L.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (05) : 1244 - 1250
  • [5] Improvements on cross-validation: The .632+ bootstrap method
    Efron, B
    Tibshirani, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 92 (438) : 548 - 560
  • [6] Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients
    Ferreira, FL
    Bota, DP
    Bross, A
    Mélot, C
    Vincent, JL
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 286 (14): : 1754 - 1758
  • [7] CRITICAL CARE IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT - A TIME-BASED STUDY
    FROMM, RE
    GIBBS, LR
    MCCALLUM, WGB
    NIZIOL, C
    BABCOCK, JC
    GUELER, AC
    LEVINE, RL
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1993, 21 (07) : 970 - 976
  • [8] THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE
    HANLEY, JA
    MCNEIL, BJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [9] Assessing contemporary intensive care unit outcome:: An updated Mortality Probability Admission Model (MPM0-III)
    Higgins, Thomas L.
    Teres, Daniel
    Copes, Wayne S.
    Nathanson, Brian H.
    Stark, Maureen
    Kramer, Andrew A.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (03) : 827 - 835
  • [10] Operational performance of validated physiologic scoring systems for predicting in-bospital mortality among critically ill emergency department patients
    Jones, AE
    Fitch, MT
    Kline, JA
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (05) : 974 - 978