Temporal progression of bean common bacterial blight (Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli) in sole and intercropping systems

被引:13
作者
Fininsa, C
Yuen, J
机构
[1] Alemaya Univ, Dept Plant Sci, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Ecol & Crop Prod Sci, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
disease progress; epidemiology; Phaseolus vulgaris; planting pattern;
D O I
10.1023/A:1019970308576
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The effects of four planting patterns of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) (bean only, maize-bean (MB), sorghum-bean (SB), and maize-bean-sorghum (MBS)) and four cropping systems (sole cropping, row, mixed, and broadcast intercropping) on the temporal epidemics of bean common bacterial blight (CBB) caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli were studied. The experiments were conducted during two consecutive spring and summer seasons in 1999 and 2000 in replicated field experiments. The Gompertz model described disease progress curves better than the logistic model. Intercropping delayed epidemic onset, lowered disease incidence and severity, and reduced the disease progress rate. The type of cropping system and planting pattern affected CBB incidence and severity at initial, final and overall assessments and also affected the rate of disease development. Statistical significance of treatment interactions based on disease assessments was found for incidence in all four experiments and for severity in three experiments. A slower disease progress rate and lower incidence and severity occurred on beans planted with maize or sorghum in row, mixed and broadcast intercropping than on bean planted alone. Incidence was reduced 36% and severity 20% in intercropping compared to sole cropping. The built-in disease delay and the slowing of the disease progress rate could provide protection for beans from severe CBB epidemics in intercropped systems. Variation between years appeared to be related to relative humidity (RH).
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 495
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   RESOURCE USE AND PLANT INTERACTIONS IN A RICE-MUNGBEAN INTERCROP [J].
AGGARWAL, PK ;
GARRITY, DP ;
LIBOON, SP ;
MORRIS, RA .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1992, 84 (01) :71-78
[2]  
ALLEN DJ, 1989, BEAN PRODUCTION CONS, P1
[3]   COMPARISON OF THE GOMPERTZ AND LOGISTIC EQUATIONS TO DESCRIBE PLANT-DISEASE PROGRESS [J].
BERGER, RD .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1981, 71 (07) :716-719
[4]   EFFECT OF INTERCROPPING BEANS WITH MAIZE ON THE SEVERITY OF ANGULAR LEAF-SPOT OF BEANS IN KENYA [J].
BOUDREAU, MA .
PLANT PATHOLOGY, 1993, 42 (01) :16-25
[5]   MECHANISMS OF ALTERATION IN BEAN RUST EPIDEMIOLOGY DUE TO INTERCROPPING WITH MAIZE [J].
BOUDREAU, MA ;
MUNDT, CC .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1992, 82 (10) :1051-1060
[6]   MECHANISMS OF ALTERATION IN BEAN RUST DEVELOPMENT DUE TO INTERCROPPING, IN COMPUTER-SIMULATED EPIDEMICS [J].
BOUDREAU, MA ;
MUNDT, CC .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1994, 4 (04) :729-740
[7]  
*CIAT, 1987, STAND SYST EV BEAM G
[8]  
DINOOR A, 1984, ANNU REV PHYTOPATHOL, V22, P443
[9]  
Fininsa C., 1997, African Crop Science Journal, V5, P15
[10]   Association of bean rust and common bacterial blight epidemics with cropping systems in Hararghe highlands, eastern Ethiopia [J].
Fininsa, C ;
Yuen, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEST MANAGEMENT, 2001, 47 (03) :211-219