Should China be promoting large-scale enterprises and enterprise groups?

被引:31
作者
Smyth, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
关键词
Asia; China; industrial policy; privatization; transitional economies;
D O I
10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00150-3
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In light of the perceived failure of enterprise groups in Japan and South Korea, various criticisms have been made of China's industrial reforms. This paper argues that the force of these criticisms has been exaggerated. In conjunction with the nonstate sector, large-scale enterprises have been an important engine for growth in China over a sustained period. The Asian crisis is often seen as a manifestation of the failure of relational-based governance, but the dismal record of small-scale industries in Central Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union suggests it is doubtful that rapid privatization and down-sizing would have given better results in China. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 737
页数:17
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
ALBOUY Y, 1991, COAL PRICING CHINA I
[2]  
AMSDEN A, 1989, EC REV PAPERS P, V81, P282
[3]  
AMSDEN A, 1994, CONVERGENCE PRODUCTI, P285
[4]  
Amsden A. H., 1994, Industrial and Corporate Change, V3, P111, DOI [10.1093/icc/3.1.111, DOI 10.1093/ICC/3.1.111]
[5]  
Amsden H.Alice., 1992, STATE MARKET DEV SYN, P53
[6]  
[Anonymous], ZHONGGUO ZHENGJUAN Q
[7]  
[Anonymous], ZHONGGUO TONGJI NIAN
[8]  
[Anonymous], BROOKINGS PAPERS EC
[9]  
[Anonymous], ZHONGGUO GONGYE JING
[10]  
[Anonymous], CHIN EC REV