Characterization of the skin penetration of a hydrocarbon-based weapons maintenance oil

被引:5
作者
Arfsten, Darryl P.
Garrett, Carol M.
Jederberg, Warren W.
Wilfong, Erin R.
McDougal, James N.
机构
[1] Navy Drug Screening Lab Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL 32212 USA
[2] USN, Hlth Res Ctr Detachment, Environm Hlth Effects Lab, Jacksonville, FL USA
[3] Wright State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pharmacol & Toxicol, Dayton, OH 45435 USA
关键词
Break-Free CLP; dermal penetration; dermal toxicity; dibasic esters; polyalphaolefin;
D O I
10.1080/15459620600819832
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 [工学]; 0830 [环境科学与工程];
摘要
Break-Free CLP is a commercial petroleum-based liquid used for cleaning, lubricating, and protecting firearms that is used in the United States by military personnel, police, and individual gun owners for maintaining a wide variety of firearms. According to its material safety data sheet (MSDS), Break-Free CLP is predominately polyalphaolefin oil but also contains dibasic ester and isoparaffinic hydrocarbons; all of these ingredients are known to induce skin irritation in laboratory animals. Studies completed in our labs found that repeated topical application of Break-Free CLP to the backs of CD-1 mice produced evidence of systemic effects. Studies were conducted to characterize the dermal penetration of Break-Free CLP in mouse, rat, and pig skin to provide insight on possible factors or causes of skin irritation and systemic effects observed in previous studies. Mouse skin was 37 times more permeable to Break-Free CLP than pig skin and 6 times more permeable than rat skin. Flux measurements from static diftusion cells showed an inverse correlation with mouse, rat, and pig skin thickness. The concentration of Break-Free CLP in mouse skin was 4.5 times higher than the amount found in rat skin and about 17 times higher than the amount absorbed by pig skin. These results support the idea that Break-Free CLP causes skin irritation and systemic effects in the mouse by both penetrating through and accumulating in the skin. The findings for rat and pig skin are probably most representative of Break-Free CLP flux into and through unprotected human skin and suggest that dermal toxicity studies in CD-I mice overestimate the risk to humans. These results nevertheless, suggest that persons handling or using Break-free CLP should protect the skin from possible exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 464
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Arfsten D.P., 1998, Immunotoxicology of Environmental and Occupational Metals
[2]
Acute and subacute dermal toxicity of Break-Free CLP®:: a weapons cleaning and maintenance compound [J].
Arfsten, DP ;
Johnson, EW ;
Thitoff, AR ;
Jung, AE ;
Still, KR ;
Brinkley, WW ;
Schaeffer, DJ ;
Jederberg, WW ;
Bobb, AJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 2005, 25 (04) :318-327
[3]
ARFSTEN DP, 2003, ACUTE TOXICITY ASSES
[4]
AZADI S, 2004, TOXICOLOGIST, V78, P45
[5]
SKIN PERMEABILITY IN-VIVO - COMPARISON IN RAT, RABBIT, PIG AND MAN [J].
BARTEK, MJ ;
LABUDDE, JA ;
MAIBACH, HI .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 1972, 58 (03) :114-&
[6]
METHODS FOR INVITRO PERCUTANEOUS-ABSORPTION STUDIES .1. COMPARISON WITH INVIVO RESULTS [J].
BRONAUGH, RL ;
STEWART, RF ;
CONGDON, ER ;
GILES, AL .
TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 1982, 62 (03) :474-480
[7]
BRUCKNER J V, 1977, National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph, V15, P124
[8]
CORNELIUS CE, 1991, HEPATOXICOLOGY
[9]
DOWNING DT, 1992, J LIPID RES, V33, P301