Impact of process design on greenhouse gas (GHG) generation by wastewater treatment plants

被引:161
作者
Shahabadi, M. Bani [1 ]
Yerushalmi, L. [1 ]
Haghighat, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Bldg Civil & Environm Engn, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Greenhouse gas; Wastewater treatment; On-site emissions; Off-site emissions; Hybrid process; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2009.02.040
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The overall on-site and off-site greenhouse gas emissions by wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) of food processing industry were estimated by using an elaborate mathematical model. Three different types of treatment processes including aerobic, anaerobic and hybrid anaerobic/aerobic processes were examined in this study. The overall on-site emissions were 1952, 1992, and 2435 kg CO(2)e/d while the off-site emissions were 1313, 4631, and 5205 kg CO(2)e/d for the aerobic, anaerobic and hybrid treatment systems, respectively, when treating a wastewater at 2000 kg BOD/d. The on-site biological processes made the highest contribution to GHG emissions in the aerobic treatment system while the highest emissions in anaerobic and hybrid treatment systems were obtained by off-site GHG emissions, mainly due to on-site material usage. Biogas recovery and reuse as fuel cover the total energy needs of the treatment plants for aeration, heating and electricity for all three types of operations, and considerably reduce GHG emissions by 512, 673, and 988 kg CO(2)e/d from a total of 3265, 6625, and 7640 kg CO(2)e/d for aerobic, anaerobic, and hybrid treatment systems, respectively. Considering the off-site GHG emissions, aerobic treatment is the least GHG producing type of treatment contrary to what has been reported in the literature. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2679 / 2687
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Andseta S., 1998, CANDU REACTORS GREEN
[2]   Nitrous oxide emissions and the anthropogenic nitrogen in wastewater and solid waste [J].
Barton, PK ;
Atwater, JW .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 128 (02) :137-150
[3]   Greenhouse gas production: A comparison between aerobic and anaerobic wastewater treatment technology [J].
Cakir, FY ;
Stenstrom, MK .
WATER RESEARCH, 2005, 39 (17) :4197-4203
[4]  
*CAN EL ASS, 1999, EL POW CAN 1998 99
[5]  
*CAN LIM I, 2001, EN EFF OPP GUID LIM
[6]   Hynol - An economical process for methanol production from biomass and natural gas with reduced CO2 emission [J].
Dong, YJ ;
Steinberg, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 1997, 22 (10-11) :971-977
[7]   Methane emissions from wastewater management [J].
El-Fadel, M ;
Massoud, M .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2001, 114 (02) :177-185
[8]   Anaerobic digestion: impact of future greenhouse gases mitigation policies on methane generation and usage [J].
Greenfield, PF ;
Batstone, DJ .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 52 (1-2) :39-47
[9]   Greenhouse gas production in wastewater treatment: process selection is the major factor [J].
Keller, J ;
Hartley, K .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 47 (12) :43-48
[10]  
Metcalf Eddy., 2003, WASTEWATER ENG TREAT, DOI DOI 10.1016/0309-1708(80)90067-6