Definition of agitation following traumatic brain injury .1. A survey of the Brain Injury Special Interest Group of the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

被引:26
作者
Fugate, LP
Spacek, LA
Kresty, LA
Levy, CE
Johnson, JC
Mysiw, WJ
机构
[1] OHIO STATE UNIV, DEPT PREVENT MED, COLUMBUS, OH 43210 USA
[2] UNIV MISSOURI, MED INFORMAT GRP, COLUMBIA, MO USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 1997年 / 78卷 / 09期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90050-2
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine national patterns of defining agitation after traumatic brain injury (TBI) by physiatrists with expressed interest in treating TBI survivors. Design: A random sample of 70% of the members of the. Brain Injury Special Interest Group (SIG) of the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AAPM&R) were surveyed by telephone. Results: The 129 members who responded yielded an 82% response rate. Respondents rated 18 characteristics from established rating scales on a 5-point scale according to each characteristic's relation to its clinical definition of agitation. Physical aggression, explosive anger, increased psychomotor activity, impulsivity, verbal aggression, disorganized thinking, perceptual disturbances, and reduced ability to maintain or appropriately shift attention were rated by at least 50% of the sample as very important or essential to agitation. Delirium, as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), has been proposed as a standard definition of agitation. The degree to which all characteristics from the 3rd revised edition of the DSM (DSM-IIIR), considered together, were perceived to relate to agitation predicted 24% of the degree to which the term ''delirium'' was perceived to relate to agitation (Canonical correlation r = .48, p = .0002). Physicians' ratings of individual delirium characteristics from the DSM-IIIR were examined to determine if a sufficient number were similarly ranked to fulfill the diagnostic criteria for delirium. A significant number of physicians rated diagnostic criteria for delirium in one direction, yet did not rank the term ''delirium'' accordingly (McNemar's p = .04). Conclusions: There is considerable variation among physiatrists in their rating of characteristics that define agitation. Many define agitation during the acute recovery phase as posttraumatic amnesia plus an excess of behavior such as aggression, disinhibition, and/or emotional lability. Less support was given to defining agitation by the DSM-IIIR or DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for delirium. Delirium appears related to, but is not sufficient for, a diagnosis of agitation. (C) 1997 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:917 / 923
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   The efficacy of 2 different dosages of methylphenidate in treating adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder [J].
Bouffard, R ;
Hechtman, L ;
Minde, K ;
Iaboni-Kassab, F .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2003, 48 (08) :546-554
[2]   AGITATION AND RESTLESSNESS AFTER CLOSED HEAD-INJURY - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF 100 CONSECUTIVE ADMISSIONS [J].
BROOKE, MM ;
QUESTAD, KA ;
PATTERSON, DR ;
BASHAK, KJ .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1992, 73 (04) :320-323
[3]  
BROOKE MM, 1992, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V73, P917
[4]  
CORRIGAN JD, 1985, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V66, P626
[5]   FACTOR STRUCTURE OF THE AGITATED BEHAVIOR SCALE [J].
CORRIGAN, JD ;
BOGNER, JA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 16 (03) :386-392
[7]  
CORRIGAN JD, 1996, RECOVERY TRAUMATIC B, P129
[8]  
Dillman D.A., 1978, Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method
[9]   BEHAVIORAL SEQUELAE OF CLOSED HEAD-INJURY - QUANTITATIVE STUDY [J].
LEVIN, HS ;
GROSSMAN, RG .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1978, 35 (11) :720-727
[10]   GALVESTON ORIENTATION AND AMNESIA TEST - PRACTICAL SCALE TO ASSESS COGNITION AFTER HEAD-INJURY [J].
LEVIN, HS ;
ODONNELL, VM ;
GROSSMAN, RG .
JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 1979, 167 (11) :675-684