Removal of pesticides by nanofiltration: effect of the water matrix

被引:120
作者
Zhang, Y
Van der Bruggen, B
Chen, GX
Braeken, L
Vandecasteele, C
机构
[1] Univ Louvain, Dept Chem Engn, Lab Environm Technol, B-3001 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Appl Ecol, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning, Peoples R China
关键词
nanofiltration; water matrix; pesticides; drinking water production;
D O I
10.1016/j.seppur.2003.11.003
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This study explores the removal of two pesticides (atrazine and simazine) from different water matrices (distilled water, tap water and river water) by nanofiltration (NF), using four types of nanofiltration membranes (DESAL 51 HL, DESAL 5 DL, UTC-20, UTC-60). Atrazine or simazine was added to the different water matrices at a concentration of 5 mg/l and 100 mug/l. Rejection of pesticides and the water flux were measured. The rejection of atrazine was always higher than the rejection of simazine; the highest rejections were obtained with UTC-20. The rejection of pesticides was higher in river water and tap water than in distilled water, but the water flux was lower. This was mainly explained by ion adsorption inside the membrane pores. Narrower pore size counteracted the effect of presence of natural organic matter (NOM). The NOM was assumed to enhance the adsorption of pesticides onto membranes surface, increased the size exclusion and electrostatic repulsion also appeared during the transport. Additionally, there was a small effect of NOM on rejection and flux. No significant effect of the pesticides concentration was observed. The rejections were the highest at pH 8 and decreased at higher and lower pH. Considerable rejections of nitrate and organic matter (measured as COD and UV absorbance at 254nm) were observed, in particular for the membrane with the smallest pores (UTC-20). This confirms the assumption that pore narrowing by ion adsorption influences the rejections and water fluxes. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 172
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Atrazine and simazine removal mechanisms by nanofiltration: Influence of natural organic matter concentration [J].
Agbekodo, KM ;
Legube, B ;
Dard, S .
WATER RESEARCH, 1996, 30 (11) :2535-2542
[2]   Removal of pesticides and other micropollutants by nanofiltration [J].
Berg, P ;
Hagmeyer, G ;
Gimbel, R .
DESALINATION, 1997, 113 (2-3) :205-208
[3]  
Clesceri L.S., 1989, STANDARD METHODS EXA, V17th
[4]   Effects of natural organic matter and the raw water matrix on the rejection of atrazine by pressure-driven membranes [J].
Devitt, EC ;
Ducellier, F ;
Cote, P ;
Wiesner, MR .
WATER RESEARCH, 1998, 32 (09) :2563-2568
[5]   Surface water potabilisation by means of a novel nanofiltration element [J].
DeWitte, JP .
DESALINATION, 1997, 108 (1-3) :153-157
[6]   Treatment of surface water rich in humus - Membrane filtration vs. conventional treatment [J].
Ericsson, B ;
Tragardh, G .
DESALINATION, 1997, 108 (1-3) :117-128
[7]  
*GLASH CROPS RES I, 1979, PEST MAN WORLD COMP
[8]  
Gunther F.A., 1970, TRIAZINE HERBICIDES, V32
[9]   Rejection properties of pesticides with a hollow fiber NF membrane (HNF-1) [J].
Kiso, Y ;
Mizuno, A ;
Othman, RAAB ;
Jung, YJ ;
Kumano, A ;
Ariji, A .
DESALINATION, 2002, 143 (02) :147-157
[10]   Rejection properties of non-phenylic pesticides with nanofiltration membranes [J].
Kiso, Y ;
Nishimura, Y ;
Kitao, T ;
Nishimura, K .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2000, 171 (02) :229-237