Efficacy and safe of atorvastatin in the prevention of cardiovascular end points in subjects with type 2 diabetes - The Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (ASPEN)

被引:423
作者
Knopp, Robert H.
D'Emden, Michael
Smilde, Johan G.
Pocock, Stuart J.
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, NW Lipid Res Clin, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Med Stat Unit, Stadskanaal, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.2337/dc05-2415
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk is increased in type 2 diabetes. The pur-study was to assess the effect of 10 mg of atorvastatin versus placebo on CVD pose of this.. prevention in subjects with type 2 diabetes and LDL cholesterol levels below contemporary guideline targets. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg of atorvastatin or placebo in a 4-year, double-blind, parallel-group study. The composite primary end point comprised cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction nonfatal stroke, recanalization, coronary artery bypass surgery, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and worsening or unstable angina requiring hospitalization. RESULTS - A total of 2,410 subjects with type 2 diabetes were randomized. Mean LDL cholesterol reduction in the atorvastatin group over 4 years was 29% versus placebo (P < 0.0001). When we compared atorvastatin versus placebo, composite primary end point rates were 13.7 and 15.0%, respectively (hazard ratio 0.90 [95% CI 0.73-1.12]). in the subset of 1,905 subjects without prior myocardial infarction or interventional procedure, 10.4% of atorvastatin- and 10.8% of placebo-treated subjects experienced a primary end point (0.97 [0.74-1.28]). In the 505 subjects with prior myocardial infarction or interventional procedure, 26.2% of atorvastatin- and 30.8% of placebo-treated subjects experienced a primary end point (0.82 [0.59-1.15]). Relative risk reductions in fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction were 27% overall (P = 0. 10) and 19% (P = 0.41) and 36% (P = 0. 11.) for subjects without and with prior myocardial infarction or interventional procedure, respectively. CONCLUSIONS - Composite end point reductions were not statistically significant. This result may relate to the overall study design, the types of subjects recruited, the nature of the primary end point, and the protocol changes required because of changing treatment guidelines. For these reasons, the results of the Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in N on-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (ASPEN) did not confirm the benefit of therapy but do not detract from the imperative that the majority of diabetic patients are at risk of coronary heart disease and deserve LDL cholesterol lowering to the currently recommended targets.
引用
收藏
页码:1478 / 1485
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, JAMA
[2]   Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins [J].
Baigent, C ;
Keech, A ;
Kearney, PM ;
Blackwell, L ;
Buck, G ;
Pollicino, C ;
Kirby, A ;
Sourjina, T ;
Peto, R ;
Collins, R ;
Simes, J .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9493) :1267-1278
[3]   Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes [J].
Cannon, CP ;
Braunwald, E ;
McCabe, CH ;
Rader, DJ ;
Rouleau, JL ;
Belder, R ;
Joyal, SV ;
Hill, KA ;
Pfeffer, MA ;
Skene, AM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (15) :1495-1504
[4]   Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) [J].
Cleeman, JI ;
Grundy, SM ;
Becker, D ;
Clark, LT ;
Cooper, RS ;
Denke, MA ;
Howard, WJ ;
Hunninghake, DB ;
Illingworth, DR ;
Luepker, RV ;
McBride, P ;
McKenney, JM ;
Pasternak, RC ;
Stone, NJ ;
Van Horn, L ;
Brewer, HB ;
Ernst, ND ;
Gordon, D ;
Levy, D ;
Rifkind, B ;
Rossouw, JE ;
Savage, P ;
Haffner, SM ;
Orloff, DG ;
Proschan, MA ;
Schwartz, JS ;
Sempos, CT ;
Shero, ST ;
Murray, EZ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (19) :2486-2497
[5]   Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial [J].
Colhoun, HM ;
Betteridge, DJ ;
Durrington, PN ;
Hitman, GA ;
Neil, HAW ;
Livingstone, SJ ;
Thomason, MJ ;
Mackness, MI ;
Charlton-Menys, V ;
Fuller, JH .
LANCET, 2004, 364 (9435) :685-696
[6]  
Collins R, 2003, LANCET, V361, P2005
[7]   Comparison of cardiovascular risk between patients with type 2 diabetes and those who had had a myocardial infarction: cross sectional and cohort studies [J].
Evans, JMM ;
Wang, JX ;
Morris, D .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7343) :939-942A
[8]  
FRIEDEWALD WT, 1972, CLIN CHEM, V18, P499
[9]  
Gavin JR, 1997, DIABETES CARE, V20, P1183
[10]   Cardiovascular events and their reduction with pravastatin in diabetic and glucose-intolerant myocardial infarction survivors with average cholesterol levels -: Subgroup analyses in the cholesterol and recurrent events (CARE) trial [J].
Goldberg, RB ;
Mellies, MJ ;
Sacks, FM ;
Moyé, LA ;
Howard, BV ;
Howard, WJ ;
Davis, BR ;
Cole, TG ;
Pfeffer, MA ;
Braunwald, E .
CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (23) :2513-2519