Measuring procedures to determine the Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review

被引:137
作者
Langensiepen, S. [1 ]
Semler, O. [2 ]
Sobottke, R. [3 ]
Fricke, O. [2 ]
Franklin, J. [4 ]
Schoenau, E. [2 ]
Eysel, P. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Childrens Hosp, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[3] Med Zentrum StadteReg Aachen, Dept Orthopaed, Ctr Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, D-52146 Wurselen, Germany
[4] Univ Cologne, Inst Med Stat Informat & Epidemiol, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[5] Univ Cologne, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
关键词
Cobb angle; Idiopathic scoliosis; Systematic review; Reproducibility; Measuring methods; Computer-assisted measuring; RELIABILITY; INTRAOBSERVER; RADIOGRAPHS; AGREEMENT; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-013-2693-9
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Scoliosis of the vertebral column can be assessed with the Cobb angle (Cobb 1948). This examination is performed manually by measuring the angle on radiographs and is considered the gold standard. However, studies evaluating the reproducibility of this procedure have shown high variability in intra- and inter-observer agreement. Because of technical advancements, interests in new procedures to determine the Cobb angle has been renewed. This review aims to systematically investigate the reproducibility of various new techniques to determine the Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis and to assess whether new technical procedures are reasonable alternatives when compared to manual measurement of the Cobb angle. Systematic review. Studies examining procedures used to determine the Cobb angle were selected. Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Statistical results of reliability and agreement were summarised and described. Eleven studies of new measuring procedures were included, all reporting the reproducibility. The new procedures can be divided into computer-assisted procedures, automatic procedures and smartphone apps. All investigated measuring procedures showed high degrees of reliability. In general, digital procedures tend to be slightly better than manual ones. For all other measurement procedures (automatic or smartphone), results varied. Studies implementing vertebral pre-selection and observer training achieved better agreement.
引用
收藏
页码:2360 / 2371
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Validity and reliability of active shape models for the estimation of Cobb angle in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis [J].
Allen, Shannon ;
Parent, Eric ;
Khorasani, Maziyar ;
Hill, Douglas L. ;
Lou, Edmond ;
Raso, James V. .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2008, 21 (02) :208-218
[2]
[Anonymous], 2008, HLTH MEASUREMENT SCA
[3]
Reliability, repeatability and reproducibility: analysis of measurement errors in continuous variables [J].
Bartlett, J. W. ;
Frost, C. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 31 (04) :466-475
[4]
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]
MEASUREMENT OF SCOLIOSIS AND KYPHOSIS RADIOGRAPHS - INTRAOBSERVER AND INTEROBSERVER VARIATION [J].
CARMAN, DL ;
BROWNE, RH ;
BIRCH, JG .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1990, 72A (03) :328-333
[6]
The reliability of quantitative analysis on digital images of the scoliotic spine [J].
Cheung, J ;
Wever, DJ ;
Veldhuizen, AG ;
Klein, JP ;
Verdonck, B ;
Nijlunsing, R ;
Cool, JC ;
Van Horn, JR .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2002, 11 (06) :535-542
[7]
Computer-assisted Cobb measurement of scoliosis [J].
Chockalingam, N ;
Dangerfield, PH ;
Giakas, G ;
Cochrane, T ;
Dorgan, JC .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2002, 11 (04) :353-357
[8]
Cobb J, 1948, Instr Course Lect, V5, P261
[9]
Corona Jacqueline, 2012, J Bone Joint Surg Am, V94, pe86, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.K.00311
[10]
When to use agreement versus reliability measures [J].
de Vet, Henrica C. W. ;
Terwee, Caroline B. ;
Knol, Dirk L. ;
Bouter, Lex M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (10) :1033-1039