Radiological Image Traits Predictive of Cancer Status in Pulmonary Nodules

被引:156
作者
Liu, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Balagurunathan, Yoganand [2 ]
Atwater, Thomas [3 ]
Antic, Sanja [3 ]
Li, Qian [1 ,2 ]
Walker, Ronald C. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Smith, Gary T. [4 ,5 ]
Massion, Pierre P. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Schabath, Matthew B. [6 ]
Gillies, Robert J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ Canc Inst & Hosp, Dept Radiol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Key Lab Canc Prevent & Therapy, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Canc Imaging & Metab, Tampa, FL USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Vanderbilt Ingram Comprehens Canc Ctr, Thorac Program, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
[5] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
[6] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Canc Epidemiol, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY CHARACTERISTICS; HIGH-RESOLUTION CT; LUNG-CANCER; PRETEST PROBABILITY; RISK; OVERDIAGNOSIS; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-3102
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Purpose: We propose a systematic methodology to quantify incidentally identified pulmonary nodules based on observed radiological traits (semantics) quantified on a point scale and a machine-learning method using these data to predict cancer status. Experimental Design: We investigated 172 patients who had low-doseCT images, with 102 and 70 patients grouped into training and validation cohorts, respectively. On the images, 24 radiological traits were systematically scored and a linear classifier was built to relate the traits tomalignant status. Themodelwas formedbothwith and without size descriptors to remove bias due to nodule size. The multivariate pairs formed on the training set were tested on an independent validation data set to evaluate their performance. Results: The best 4-feature set that included a size measurement (set 1), was short axis, contour, concavity, and texture, which had an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.88 (accuracy - 81%, sensitivity - 76.2%, specificity - 91.7%). If size measures were excluded, the four best features (set 2) were location, fissure attachment, lobulation, and spiculation, which had an AUROC of 0.83 (accuracy = 73.2%, sensitivity - 73.8%, specificity - 81.7%) in predicting malignancy in primary nodules. The validation test AUROC was 0.8 (accuracy = 74.3%, sensitivity = 66.7%, specificity = 75.6%) and 0.74 (accuracy = 71.4%, sensitivity = 61.9%, specificity = 75.5%) for sets 1 and 2, respectively. Conclusions: Radiological image traits are useful in predicting malignancy in lung nodules. These semantic traits can be used in combination with size-based measures to enhance prediction accuracy and reduce false-positives. (C) 2016 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:1442 / 1449
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening [J].
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Black, William C. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Fagerstrom, Richard M. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Sicks, JoRean D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) :395-409
[2]
Baseline Characteristics of Participants in the Randomized National Lung Screening Trial [J].
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Clingan, Kathy L. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Lynch, David A. ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Pinsky, Paul F. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2010, 102 (23) :1771-1779
[3]
[Anonymous], 2005, Permutation, Parametric and Bootstrap Tests of Hypotheses
[4]
[Anonymous], 1993, An introduction to the bootstrap
[5]
[Anonymous], 2013, INTRO STAT LEARNING
[6]
[Anonymous], NCCN GUID LUNG CANC
[7]
Armato S.G., 2015, The cancer imaging archive
[8]
Special Section Guest Editorial: LUNGx Challenge for computerized lung nodule classification: Reflections and lessons learned [J].
Armato, Samuel G. ;
Hadjiiski, Lubomir ;
Tourassi, Georgia D. ;
Drukker, Karen ;
Giger, Maryellen L. ;
Li, Feng ;
Redmond, George ;
Farahani, Keyvan ;
Kirby, Justin S. ;
Clarke, Laurence P. .
Journal of Medical Imaging, 2015, 2 (02)
[9]
Expert Opinion United States Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation on Screening for Lung Cancer [J].
Boiselle, Phillip M. ;
Chiles, Caroline ;
Patz, Edward ;
Tammemaegi, Martin ;
Wood, Douglas E. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2014, 29 (04) :197-197
[10]
Pulmonary Nodule Detection, Characterization, and Management With Multidetector Computed Tomography [J].
Brandman, Scott ;
Ko, Jane P. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2011, 26 (02) :90-105