Plasma, oral fluid and sweat wipe ecstasy concentrations in controlled and real life conditions

被引:72
作者
Samyn, N
De Boeck, G
Wood, M
Lamers, CTJ
De Waard, D
Brookhuis, KA
Verstraete, AG
Riedel, WJ
机构
[1] Natl Inst Criminalist & Criminol, Sect Toxicol, B-1120 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Micromass Ltd, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Maastricht Univ, Brain & Behav Inst, Expt Psychopharmacol Unit, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Dept Psychol, NL-9712 TS Groningen, Netherlands
[5] State Univ Ghent Hosp, Lab Clin Biol Toxicol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
MDMA; controlled study; oral fluid; sweat; driving under the influence; LG-MS/MS;
D O I
10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00157-3
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
In a double-blind placebo controlled study on psychomotor skills important for car driving (Study 1), a 75 mg dose of 3,4methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) was administered orally to 12 healthy Volunteers who were known to be recreational MDMA-users. Toxicokinetic data were gathered by analysis of blood, urine. oral fluid and sweat wipes collected during the first 5 h after administration. Resultant plasma concentrations varied from 21 to 295 ng/ml, with an average peak concentration of 178 ng/ml observed between 2 and 4 h after administration. MDA concentrations never exceeded 20 ng/ml. Corresponding MDMA concentrations in oral fluid, as measured with a specific LC-MS/MS method (which required only 50 mul of oral fluid), generally exceeded those in plasma and peaked at an average concentration of 1215 ng/ml. A substantial intra- and inter-subject variability was observed with this matrix, and values ranged from 50 to 6982 ng/ml MDMA. Somewhat even 4-5 h after ingestion, the MDMA levels in sweat only averaged 25 ng/wipe. In addition to this controlled study, data were collected from 19 MDMA-users who participated in a driving simulator study (Study 2), comparing sober non-drug conditions with MDMA-only and multiple drug use conditions. In this particular study, urine samples were used for general drug screening and oral fluid was collected as an alternative to blood sampling. Analysis of oral fluid samples by LC-MS/MS revealed an average MDMA/MDEA concentration of 1121 ng/ml in the MDMA-only condition, with large inter-subject variability. This was also the case in the multiple drug condition, where generally, significantly higher concentrations of MDMA, MDEA and/or amphetamine were detected in the oral fluid samples. Urine screening revealed the presence of combinations such as MDMA, MDEA, amph, cannabis, cocaine, LSD and psilocine in the rnultiple-drug condition. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 97
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
BROOKHUIS KA, 2000, P 15 ICADTS C STOCKH, P602
[2]   Determination of γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) in biological specimens by cas chromatography -: Mass spectrometry [J].
Couper, FJ ;
Logan, BK .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2000, 24 (01) :1-7
[3]  
DEWAARD D, 2000, P 15 ICADTS C STOCKH, P611
[4]  
Franke JP, 1998, J CHROMATOGR B, V713, P51
[5]   The urinary excretion of γ-hydroxybutyric acid in man [J].
Kavanagh, PV ;
Kenny, P ;
Feely, J .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 53 (03) :399-402
[6]   Excretion of MBDB and BDB in urine, saliva, and sweat following single oral administration [J].
Kintz, P .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1997, 21 (07) :570-575
[7]  
LAMERS C, 2002, IN PRESS NEUROPSYCHO
[8]  
Mas M, 1999, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V290, P136
[9]  
Navarro M, 2001, CLIN CHEM, V47, P1788
[10]   On-site testing of saliva and sweat with Drugwipe and determination of concentrations of drugs of abuse in saliva, plasma and urine of suspected users [J].
Samyn, N ;
van Haeren, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2000, 113 (03) :150-154