In silico prediction of blood - Brain barrier permeation using the calculated molecular cross-sectional area as main parameter

被引:65
作者
Gerebtzoff, Gregori [1 ]
Seelig, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Biozentrum, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ci0600814
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
The cross-sectional area, A(D), of a compound oriented in an amphiphilic gradient such as the air-water or lipid-water interface has previously been shown to be crucial for membrane partitioning and permeation, respectively. Here, we developed an algorithm that determines the molecular axis of amphiphilicity and the cross-sectional area, A(Dcalc), perpendicular to this axis. Starting from the conformational ensemble of each molecule, the three-dimensional conformation selected as the membrane-binding conformation was the one with the smallest cross-sectional area, A(DcalcM), and the strongest amphiphilicity. The calculated, A(DcalcM), and the measured, AD, cross-sectional areas correlated linearly (n = 55, slope, m = 1.04, determination coefficient, r(2) = 0.95). The calculated cross-sectional areas, A(DcalcM), were then used together with the calculated octanol-water distribution coefficients, log D-7.4, of the 55 compounds (with a known ability to permeate the blood-brain barrier) to establish a calibration diagram for the prediction of blood-brain barrier permeation. It yielded a limiting cross-sectional area (A(DcalcM) = 70 angstrom(2)) and an optimal range of octanol-water distribution coefficients (-1.4 <= log D-7.4 < 7.0). The calibration diagram was validated with an independent set of 43 compounds with the known ability to permeate the blood-brain barrier, yielding a prediction accuracy of 86%. The incorrectly predicted compounds exhibited log D-7.4 values comprised between -0.6 and -1.4, suggesting that the limitation for log D-7.4 is less rigorous than the limitation for AD. An accuracy of 83% has been obtained for a second validation set of 42 compounds which were previously shown to be difficult to predict. The calculated parameters, A(DcalcM) and log D-7.4, thus allow for a fast and accurate prediction of blood-brain barrier permeation. Analogous calibration diagrams can be established for other membrane barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:2638 / 2650
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, MERCK INDEX ENCY CHE
[3]   EFFICIENT EXACT SOLUTION OF THE RING PERCEPTION PROBLEM [J].
BALDUCCI, R ;
PEARLMAN, RS .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1994, 34 (04) :822-831
[4]   Drug liposome partitioning as a tool for the prediction of human passive intestinal absorption [J].
Balon, K ;
Riebesehl, BU ;
Müller, BW .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 16 (06) :882-888
[5]   THE EFFECTS OF PH ON THE AFFINITY OF PIRENZEPINE FOR MUSCARINIC RECEPTORS IN THE GUINEA-PIG ILEUM AND RAT FUNDUS STRIP [J].
BARLOW, RB ;
CHAN, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1982, 77 (03) :559-563
[6]   EFFECT OF MONOLAYER SURFACE PRESSURE ON THE ACTIVITIES OF PHOSPHOINOSITIDE-SPECIFIC PHOSPHOLIPASE-C-BETA-1, PHOSPHOLIPASE-C-GAMMA-1, AND PHOSPHOLIPASE-C-DELTA-1 [J].
BOGUSLAVSKY, V ;
REBECCHI, M ;
MORRIS, AJ ;
JHON, DY ;
RHEE, SG ;
MCLAUGHLIN, S .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1994, 33 (10) :3032-3037
[7]   VAN DER WAALS VOLUMES + RADII [J].
BONDI, A .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1964, 68 (03) :441-+
[8]   In vitro model for evaluating drug transport across the blood-brain barrier [J].
Cecchelli, R ;
Dehouck, B ;
Descamps, L ;
Fenart, L ;
Buée-Scherrer, V ;
Duhem, C ;
Lundquist, S ;
Rentfel, M ;
Torpier, G ;
Dehouck, MP .
ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS, 1999, 36 (2-3) :165-178
[9]   In silico prediction of blood-brain barrier permeation [J].
Clark, DE .
DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2003, 8 (20) :927-933
[10]   Predicting blood-brain barrier permeation from three-dimensional molecular structure [J].
Crivori, P ;
Cruciani, G ;
Carrupt, PA ;
Testa, B .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 43 (11) :2204-2216