Hepatic parenchymal enhancement during triple-phase helical CT: Can it be used to predict which patients with breast cancer will develop hepatic metastases?

被引:21
作者
Sheafor, DH
Killius, JS
Paulson, EK
DeLong, DM
Foti, AM
Nelson, RC
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Windsong Radiol, Buffalo, NY USA
关键词
breast neoplasms; metastases; computed tomography (CT); helical; liver; blood supply; CT; liver neoplasms; secondary;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.214.3.r00mr36875
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of hepatic enhancement characteristics for identification of patients with breast cancer who are at risk for future hepatic metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Triple-phase helical computed tomography (CT) was performed in 60 patients with known breast cancer without visible hepatic metastases. Peak hepatic attenuation and enhancement, and attenuation and enhancement at 25 and 30 seconds were obtained. Ratios of hepatic attenuation or;enhancement at 25 and 30 seconds to peak hepatic attenuation or enhancement were calculated. A Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare patients with and those without subsequent hepatic metastases. RESULTS: During a mean 18-month follow-up, 18 patients (30%) developed hepatic metastases. Decreases in peak hepatic attenuation and enhancement and increases in hepatic attenuation and enhancement ratios at 25 and 30 seconds were seen in patients who developed metastases compared with those who did not (P < .05). When corrected for chemotherapy interval, these differences were not statistically significant. Using a threshold value of 0.40 or more for the enhancement ratio at 30 seconds resulted in sensitivity of 28%, specificity of 92%, and accuracy of 55%. CONCLUSION: Patients with breast cancer who develop subsequent hepatic metastases have higher relative hepatic arterial perfusion during triple-phase CT; however, after correction for chemotherapy interval, this difference was not statistically significant. Threshold values cannot be used reliably to identify patients who will develop metastases.
引用
收藏
页码:875 / 880
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   UNDERSTANDING AND OPTIMIZING USE OF CONTRAST MATERIAL FOR CT OF THE LIVER [J].
BARON, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 163 (02) :323-331
[2]   INVESTIGATION OF CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT IN CT OF THE LIVER - THE NEED FOR IMPROVED METHODS [J].
DODD, GD ;
BARON, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1993, 160 (03) :643-645
[3]  
FLEMING JS, 1983, J NUCL MED, V24, P1108
[4]   DETECTION OF FOCAL HEPATIC MASSES - PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION WITH CT, DELAYED CT, CT DURING ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY, AND MR IMAGING [J].
HEIKEN, JP ;
WEYMAN, PJ ;
LEE, JKT ;
BALFE, DM ;
PICUS, D ;
BRUNT, EM ;
FLYE, MW .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 171 (01) :47-51
[5]   Portal-phase contrast-enhanced helical CT for the detection of malignant hepatic tumors: Sensitivity based on comparison with intraoperative and pathologic findings [J].
Kuszyk, BS ;
Bluemke, DA ;
Urban, BA ;
Choti, MA ;
Hruban, RH ;
Sitzmann, JV ;
Fishman, EK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (01) :91-95
[6]  
Leconte I, 1998, RADIOLOGY, V209P, P487
[7]   DETECTION OF HEPATIC METASTASES USING DUPLEX COLOR DOPPLER SONOGRAPHY [J].
LEEN, E ;
GOLDBERG, JA ;
ROBERTSON, J ;
SUTHERLAND, GR ;
HEMINGWAY, DM ;
COOKE, TG ;
MCARDLE, CS .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1991, 214 (05) :599-604
[8]   DETECTION OF COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES - COMPARISON OF LAPAROTOMY, CT, US, AND DOPPLER PERFUSION INDEX AND EVALUATION OF POSTOPERATIVE FOLLOW-UP RESULTS [J].
LEEN, E ;
ANGERSON, WJ ;
WOTHERSPOON, H ;
MOULE, B ;
COOK, TG ;
MCARDLE, CS .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (01) :113-116
[9]   DERANGED LIVER BLOOD-FLOW PATTERNS IN THE DETECTION OF LIVER METASTASES [J].
LEVESON, SH ;
WIGGINS, PA ;
GILES, GR ;
PARKIN, A ;
ROBINSON, PJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 72 (02) :128-130
[10]   LIVER METASTASES FROM COLORECTAL CANCERS - DETECTION WITH CT DURING ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY [J].
MATSUI, O ;
TAKASHIMA, T ;
KADOYA, M ;
SUZUKI, M ;
HIROSE, J ;
KAMEYAMA, T ;
CHOTO, S ;
KONISHI, H ;
IDA, M ;
YAMAGUCHI, A ;
IZUMI, R .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 165 (01) :65-69