Successful treatment of acute, ongoing rat lung allograft rejection with the novel immunosuppressant SDZ-RAD

被引:18
作者
Hausen, B
Boeke, K
Berry, GJ
Christians, U
Schüler, W
Morris, RE
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Pathol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Biopharmaceut Sci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-4975(99)01504-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Recent experimental data have shown that coadministration of microemulsion cyclosporine and the novel immunosuppressant SDZ-RAD potentiates the immunosuppressive efficacies of both drugs to suppress allograft rejection. Our study was designed to assess the potential of delayed SDZ-RAD administration, in addition to cyclosporine maintenance therapy, to reverse acute rejection in an allogeneic rat lung transplant model. Methods. Unilateral left lung transplantation was performed using Brown-Norway donors implanted into Lewis recipients. An untreated control group and a cyclosporine monotherapy group (7.5 mg/kg) were followed for 7 days. An additional cyclosporine monotherapy group (7.5 mg/kg), and a combined therapy group treated with cyclosporine (7.5 mg/kg) plus SDZ-RAD (2.5 mg/kg), were followed for 21 days. For treatment of ongoing rejection, 7.5 mg/kg cyclosporine was given as maintenance therapy, and SDZ-RAD (2.5 mg/kg) was added on postoperative day 7. Drugs were given orally, and in the combined therapy regimens, administered 6 hours apart. Outcome variables included daily weight, radiographs, and histology. Results. Radiographs on postoperative day 7 showed mad and moderate opacification of the left chest in the cyclosporine monotherapy groups and the untreated control group. Addition of SDZ-RAD to cyclosporine treatment on postoperative day 7 reversed opacification by postoperative days 14 and 21. Monotherapy with micro-emulsion CsA resulted in mild histological rejection by day 7, which progressed to moderate rejection by day 21 Addition of SDZ-RAD on postoperative day 7 reversed acute rejection, resulting in none or minimal rejection at day 21. Conclusions. SDZ RAD reverses acute rejection under cyclosporine maintenance therapy in a stringent lung allotransplant model.
引用
收藏
页码:904 / 909
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   OBLITERATIVE BRONCHIOLITIS AFTER LUNG AND HEART-LUNG TRANSPLANTATION - AN ANALYSIS OF RISK-FACTORS AND MANAGEMENT [J].
BANDO, K ;
PARADIS, IL ;
SIMILO, S ;
KONISHI, H ;
KOMATSU, K ;
ZULLO, TG ;
YOUSEM, SA ;
CLOSE, JM ;
ZEEVI, A ;
DUQUESNOY, RJ ;
MANZETTI, J ;
KEENAN, RJ ;
ARMITAGE, JM ;
HARDESTY, RL ;
GRIFFITH, BP .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1995, 110 (01) :4-14
[2]   Immunomodulation in transplantation with photopheresis [J].
Barr, ML .
ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 1996, 20 (08) :971-973
[3]  
Cahill BC, 1996, J HEART LUNG TRANSPL, V15, P1130
[4]  
CHEN H, 1993, TRANSPLANT P, V25, P719
[5]   EXTRACORPOREAL PHOTOCHEMOTHERAPY AS ADJUVANT TREATMENT OF HEART-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS WITH RECURRENT REJECTION [J].
DALLAMICO, R ;
LIVI, U ;
MILANO, A ;
MONTINI, G ;
ANDREETTA, B ;
MURER, L ;
ZACCHELLO, G ;
THIENE, G ;
CASAROTTO, D ;
ZACCHELLO, F .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1995, 60 (01) :45-49
[6]  
Danovitch G, 1996, TRANSPLANTATION, V61, P722
[7]  
FERRARESSO M, 1993, TRANSPLANT P, V25, P729
[8]  
Girgis RE, 1996, J HEART LUNG TRANSPL, V15, P1200
[9]   Coadministration of neoral and the novel rapamycin analog, SDZ RAD, to rat lung allograft recipients - Potentiation of immunosuppressive efficacy and improvement of tolerability by staggered versus simultaneous treatment [J].
Hausen, B ;
Boeke, K ;
Berry, GJ ;
Segarra, I ;
Benet, LZ ;
Christians, U ;
Morris, RE .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (07) :956-962
[10]   Combined immunosuppression with cyclosporine (Neoral) and SDZ RAD in non-human primate lung transplantation: Systematic pharmacokinetic-based trials to improve efficacy and tolerability [J].
Hausen, B ;
Ikonen, T ;
Briffa, N ;
Berry, GJ ;
Christians, U ;
Robbins, RC ;
Hook, L ;
Serkova, N ;
Benet, LZ ;
Schuler, W ;
Morris, RE .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 69 (01) :76-86