Vegetation class dependent errors in lidar ground elevation and canopy height estimates in a boreal wetland environment

被引:146
作者
Hopkinson, Chris
Chasmer, Laura E.
Sass, Gabor
Creed, Irena F.
Sitar, Michael
Kalbfleisch, William
Treitz, Paul
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Geog, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Geog, London, ON N6A 5C2, Canada
[3] Optech Inc, Toronto, ON M3J 2Z9, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.5589/m05-007
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
An airborne scanning light detection and ranging (lidar) survey using a discrete pulse return airborne laser terrain mapper (ALTM) was conducted over the Utikuma boreal wetland area of northern Alberta in August 2002. These data were analysed to quantify vegetation class dependent errors in lidar ground surface elevation and vegetation canopy surface height. The sensitivity of lidar-derived land-cover frictional parameters to these height errors was also investigated. Aquatic vegetation was associated with the largest error in lidar ground surface definition (+0.15 m, SD = 0.22, probability of no difference in height P < 0.01), likely a result of saturated ground conditions. The largest absolute errors in lidar canopy surface height were associated with tall vegetation classes; however, the largest relative errors were associated with low shrub (63%, -0.52 m, P < 0.01) and aquatic vegetation (54%, -0.24 m, P < 0.01) classes. The openness and orientation of vegetation foliage (i.e., minimal projection of horizontal area) were thought to enhance laser pulse canopy surface penetration in these two classes. Raster canopy height models (CHMs) underestimated field heights by between 3% (aspens and black spruce) and 64% (aquatic vegetation). Lidar canopy surface height errors led to hydraulic Darcy-Weisbach friction factor underestimates of 10%-49% for short (< 2 m) vegetation classes and overestimates of 12%-41% for taller vegetation classes.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 206
页数:16
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, THESIS U BRIT COLUMB
[2]  
[Anonymous], CANADAS FORESTS CROS
[3]   Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas [J].
Baltsavias, EP .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 1999, 54 (2-3) :199-214
[4]   Evaluation of light detection and ranging (LIDAR) for measuring river corridor topography [J].
Bowen, ZH ;
Waltermire, RG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2002, 38 (01) :33-41
[5]   Two-dimensional hydraulic flood modelling using a finite-element mesh decomposed according to vegetation and topographic features derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry [J].
Cobby, DM ;
Mason, DC ;
Horritt, MS ;
Bates, PD .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2003, 17 (10) :1979-2000
[6]   Image processing of airborne scanning laser altimetry data for improved river flood modelling [J].
Cobby, DM ;
Mason, DC ;
Davenport, IJ .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2001, 56 (02) :121-138
[7]  
Crawford TM, 2000, J APPL METEOROL, V39, P1196, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<1196:AODSEB>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]   Improving bird population models using airborne remote sensing [J].
Davenport, IJ ;
Bradbury, RB ;
Anderson, GQA ;
Hayman, GRF ;
Krebs, JR ;
Mason, DC ;
Wilson, JD ;
Veck, NJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2000, 21 (13-14) :2705-2717
[10]  
DEVITO KJ, 2000, HYDROLOGY ECOLOGY DI