Microfiltration of protein precipitate from clarified yeast cell homogenate for the recovery of a soluble product

被引:5
作者
Levesley, JA [1 ]
Seggianni, M [1 ]
Hoare, M [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Adv Ctr Biochem Engn, Dept Chem & Biochem Engn, London WC1E 7JE, England
关键词
D O I
10.1081/SS-100100181
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
A crossflow microfiltration unit was used to recover the soluble proteins from a protein precipitate suspension prepared from disrupted yeast. The effects of the process parameters transmembrane pressure (TMP), crossflow velocity, and suspension concentration on the permeate flux and transmission (sieving coefficient) of soluble proteins were determined. Flux increased with increasing crossflow velocity and decreasing concentration, and increased with increasing TMP up to a critical value at which the flux became independent of pressure. Protein transmission also increased with increasing crossflow and decreasing concentration, but had a maximum value at a critical TMP, near the critical value for flux, and declined at higher pressures. A simple analysis based on film theory indicated that the pattern of variation in measured transmission (i.e., permeate protein concentration divided by feed protein concentration) with increasing TMP was due to two competing factors: increasing protein concentration at the membrane surface and decreasing intrinsic transmission (i.e., transmission calculated with respect to the concentration at the membrane surface). Although flux and transmission both increased with decreasing concentration, it was found that an intermediate concentration gave the best rate of soluble protein recovery. Differences were also noted between the transmission of a target enzyme, alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), and the overall transmission of total soluble protein.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 649
页数:17
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Analysis of proteins transmission in vortex flow ultrafilter for mass transfer coefficient [J].
Agarwal, GP .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1997, 136 (1-2) :141-151
[2]   LIMITING FLUX IN MEMBRANE SEPARATIONS - A MODEL BASED ON THE VISCOSITY DEPENDENCY OF THE MASS-TRANSFER COEFFICIENT [J].
AIMAR, P ;
FIELD, R .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1992, 47 (03) :579-586
[3]   STUDY OF PROTEIN TRANSMISSION THROUGH ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES [J].
BALAKRISHNAN, M ;
AGARWAL, GP ;
COONEY, CL .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1993, 85 (02) :111-128
[4]   THE BEHAVIOR OF SUSPENSIONS AND MACROMOLECULAR SOLUTIONS IN CROSS-FLOW MICROFILTRATION [J].
BELFORT, G ;
DAVIS, RH ;
ZYDNEY, AL .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1994, 96 (1-2) :1-58
[5]  
BENNASAR M, 1982, J SOC DAIRY TECHNOL, V35, P43, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0307.1982.tb02711.x
[6]   PROTEIN PRECIPITATE RECOVERY USING MICROPOROUS MEMBRANES [J].
BENTHAM, AC ;
IRETON, MJ ;
HOARE, M ;
DUNNILL, P .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 1988, 31 (09) :984-994
[7]  
BERGMEYER HU, 1983, METHODS ENZYMATIC AN
[8]   MECHANISMS GOVERNING PERMEATE FLUX AND PROTEIN REJECTION IN THE MICROFILTRATION OF BEER WITH A CYCLOPORE MEMBRANE [J].
BLANPAIN, P ;
HERMIA, J ;
LENOEL, M .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1993, 84 (1-2) :37-51
[9]   PROPERTIES OF MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES - MECHANISMS OF FLUX LOSS IN THE RECOVERY OF AN ENZYME [J].
BOWEN, WR ;
HALL, NJ .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 1995, 46 (01) :28-35
[10]  
Clarkson AI, 1996, BIOPROCESS ENG, V14, P69