Abstract morphemes and lexical representation: the CV-Skeleton in Arabic

被引:43
作者
Boudelaa, S [1 ]
Marslen-Wilson, WD [1 ]
机构
[1] MRC, Cognit & Brain Sci Unit, Cambridge CB2 2EF, England
关键词
mental lexicon; morphology; CV-Skeleton; semitic; Arabic; word pattern; vocalic melody; priming;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2003.08.003
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Overlaps in form and meaning between morphologically related words have led to ambiguities in interpreting priming effects in studies of lexical organization. In Semitic languages like Arabic, however, linguistic analysis proposes that one of the three component morphemes of a surface word is the CV-Skeleton, an abstract prosodic unit coding the phonological shape of the surface word and its primary syntactic function, which has no surface phonetic content (McCarthy, J. J. (1981). A prosodic theory of non-concatenative morphology, Linguistic Inquiry, 12 373-418). The other two morphemes are proposed to be the vocalic melody, which conveys additional syntactic information, and the root, which defines meaning. In three experiments using masked, cross-modal, and auditory-auditory priming we examined the role of the vocalic melody and the CV-Skeleton as potential morphemic units in the processing and representation of Arabic words. Prime/target pairs sharing the vocalic melody but not the CV-Skeleton consistently failed to prime. In contrast, word pairs sharing only the CV-Skeleton primed reliably throughout, with the amount of priming being as large as that observed between word pattern pairs sharing both vocalic melody and CV-Skeleton. Priming between morphologically related words can be observed when there is no overlap either in C meaning or in surface phonetic form. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 303
页数:33
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Abdah D. A., 1979, FREQUENT WORDS ARABI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1979, THESIS MIT CAMBRIDGE
[3]  
Aronoff M., 1976, WORD FORMATION GENER
[4]  
Barkai M., 1980, AFROASIATIC LINGUIST, V7, P163
[5]  
Beland R., 1990, Jounal of Neurolinguistics, V5, P125, DOI DOI 10.1016/0911-6044(90)90009-N
[6]   Linguistic theory and psychological reality: a reply to Boudelaa & Marslen-Wilson [J].
Bentin, S ;
Frost, R .
COGNITION, 2001, 81 (01) :113-118
[7]   A ROSE IS A REEZ - THE 2-CYCLES MODEL OF PHONOLOGY ASSEMBLY IN READING ENGLISH [J].
BERENT, I ;
PERFETTI, CA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1995, 102 (01) :146-184
[8]   The effect of shared structure and content on reading nonwords: Evidence for a CV skeleton [J].
Berent, I ;
Bouissa, R ;
Tuller, B .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2001, 27 (04) :1042-1057
[9]  
Blumstein S., 1978, Syllables and Segments, P189
[10]   Neuroperceptual differences in consonant and vowel discrimination: As revealed by direct cortical electrical interference [J].
Boatman, D ;
Hall, C ;
Goldstein, MH ;
Lesser, R ;
Gordon, B .
CORTEX, 1997, 33 (01) :83-98