Reducing pain of first trimester abortion under local anaesthesia

被引:11
作者
Donati, S
Medda, E
Proietti, S
Rizzo, L
Spinelli, A
Subrizi, D
Grandolfo, ME
机构
[1] UNIV ROMA LA SAPIENZA,REPARTO PICCOLA CHIRURG,I CLIN OSTET & GINECOL POLICLIN I,ROME,ITALY
[2] UNIV ROMA LA SAPIENZA,REPARTO PICCOLA CHIRURG,CLIN OSTET 1,ROME,ITALY
[3] UNIV ROMA LA SAPIENZA,GINECOL POLICLIN UMBERTO 1,ROME,ITALY
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY | 1996年 / 70卷 / 02期
关键词
general anaesthesia; local anaesthesia; pain;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-2115(95)02583-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The study aimed to estimate the pain related to first trimester abortion under local and general anaesthesia. One hundred and eighty-one women undergoing abortion of first trimester under local anaesthesia and 198 under general anaesthesia were interviewed 1 h after the end of the procedure. About 50% of all women described their experience as less painful than expected. Over 50% of the women described the pain during the procedure as mild or moderate according to the verbal rating scale. The step-up logistic regression analyses identified four important variables: time interval less than 2 min from local anaesthesia injection to the beginning of the procedure (RR = 3), lack of choice between local and general anaesthesia (RR = 1.9), history of frequent use of analgesics (RR = 1.9) and nulliparity (RR = 1.7). These data indicate that skilfully performed abortion with local anaesthesia is a procedure tolerated by most women. Moreover, because it carries lower risk of complications and costs less, its use should be encouraged. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 149
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   LEGAL-ABORTION MORTALITY AND GENERAL-ANESTHESIA [J].
ATRASH, HK ;
CHEEK, TG ;
HOGUE, CJR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1988, 158 (02) :420-424
[2]   PAIN OF 1ST-TRIMESTER ABORTION - A STUDY OF PSYCHOSOCIAL AND MEDICAL PREDICTORS [J].
BELANGER, E ;
MELZACK, R ;
LAUZON, P .
PAIN, 1989, 36 (03) :339-350
[3]   ABORTION COUNSELING - EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF 3 TECHNIQUES [J].
BRACKEN, MB ;
GROSSMAN, G ;
HACHAMOV.M ;
SUSSMAN, D ;
SCHRIEIR, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1973, 117 (01) :10-20
[4]  
BUELHER JW, 1985, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V153, P14
[5]   THE ITALIAN PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
DEBENEDITTIS, G ;
MASSEI, R ;
NOBILI, R ;
PIERI, A .
PAIN, 1988, 33 (01) :53-62
[6]   LOCAL VERSUS GENERAL-ANESTHESIA - WHICH IS SAFER FOR PERFORMING SUCTION CURETTAGE ABORTIONS [J].
GRIMES, DA ;
SCHULZ, KF ;
CATES, W ;
TYLER, CW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1979, 135 (08) :1030-1035
[7]  
HENSHAW SK, 1990, INDUCED ABORTION WOR
[8]  
KAMINSKI M, 1991, Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et biologie de la Reproduction, V20, P767
[9]   SELF-BLAME, SELF-EFFICACY, AND ADJUSTMENT TO ABORTION [J].
MUELLER, P ;
MAJOR, B .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 57 (06) :1059-1068
[10]   GENERAL-ANESTHESIA, A RISK FACTOR FOR COMPLICATION FOLLOWING INDUCED-ABORTION [J].
OSBORN, JF ;
ARISI, E ;
SPINELLI, A ;
STAZI, MA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 6 (04) :416-422