Hybrid or unique? The Japanese welfare state between Europe and America

被引:137
作者
EspingAndersen, G
机构
关键词
confucianism; corporatism; familialism; welfare regime;
D O I
10.1177/095892879700700301
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
In the contemporary welfare state literature, both japan and Southern Europe are often held to be distinct regimes. A comparative examination of the evidence for Japan suggests that this is not true. Japan's fusion of key elements of catholic-conservative welfare states (occupational segmentation and familism) with a liberal, American-style dominance of private welfare plans gives the appearance of a hybrid system. On balance, there is little to indicate a distinct 'Pacific' model. Regardless, any attempt at labeling the Japanese welfare state is premature since it has not yet sunk its roots, institutionally speaking.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 189
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, FAMILIES NATIONS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, WELFARE SUITE E W
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139174053,015
[4]  
[Anonymous], WELFARE STATES TRANS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, The comparative political economy of the welfare state, DOI DOI 10.1017/0309781139174053.014
[6]  
CASTLES F, 1995, ISA RES COMM 19 SEPT
[7]  
Dore R., 1973, BRIT FACTORY JAPANES
[8]  
Esping-Andersen G., 1996, WELFARE STATES TRANS
[9]  
ESPING-ANDERSEN Gosta -., 2009, INCOMPLETE REVOLUTIO
[10]  
Ferrera Maurizio., 1996, Journal of European Social Policy, V6, DOI DOI 10.1177/095892879600600102