Meeting Minamata: Cost-effective compliance options for atmospheric mercury control in Chinese coal-fired power plants

被引:49
作者
Ancora, Maria Pia [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Shuxiao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schreifels, Jeremy J. [1 ]
Hao, Jiming [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Con, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Reg Environm Qual, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] State Environm Protect Key Lab Sources & Control, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Atmospheric mercury; Coal-fired power plants; China; Minamata Convention; Best available techniques (BATs); CONTROL STRATEGIES; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.048
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A new international treaty, Minamata Convention, identifies mercury (Hg) as a global threat to human health and seeks to control its releases and emissions. Coal-fired power plants are a major source of mercury pollution worldwide and are expected to be the first key sector to be addressed in China under Minamata Convention. A best available technique (BAT) adoption model was developed in the form of a decision tree and cost-effectiveness for each technological option. Co-benefit control technologies and their enhancement with coal blending/switching and halogen injection (HI) can provide early measures to help China meet the Minamata Convention obligations. We project future energy and policy scenarios to simulate potential national mercury reduction goals for China and estimate costs of the control measures for each scenario. The "Minamata Medium" scenario, equivalent to the goal of the US Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) rule, requires the application of activated carbon injection (ACI) and HI on 30% and 20% of power plants, respectively. The corresponding total costs would be $2.5 billion, approximately one-fourth the costs in the US. An emission limit of 3 mu g/m(3) in 2030 was identified as a feasible policy option for China to comply with Minamata Convention. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 494
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[11]   Mercury transformation across particulate control devices in six power plants of China: The co-effect of chlorine and ash composition [J].
Chen Lei ;
Duan Yufeng ;
Zhuo Yuqun ;
Yang Liguo ;
Zhang Liang ;
Yang Xianghua ;
Yao Qiang ;
Jiang Yiman ;
Xu Xuchang .
FUEL, 2007, 86 (04) :603-610
[12]  
EPA-US, 2011, MERC AIR TOX STAND M
[13]  
European Union, 2011, 92011 EEA EUR UN
[14]  
Feeley T.J., 2008, MEGA S BALT MD US
[15]  
German Federal Government, 2013, 13 BUND IMM VER
[16]  
Honjo S., 2012, MHI MERCURY REMOVAL
[17]  
Japan Ministry of Environment, 2013, LESS MIN DIS MERC MA
[18]   Mercury in coal and the impact of coal quality on mercury emissions from combustion systems [J].
Kolker, Allan ;
Senior, Constance L. ;
Quick, Jeffrey C. .
APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2006, 21 (11) :1821-1836
[19]   Process Optimization Guidance (POG and iPOG) for Mercury Emissions Control [J].
Krishnakumar, Balaji ;
Niksa, Stephen ;
Sloss, Lesley ;
Jozewicz, Wojciech ;
Futsaeter, Gunnar .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2012, 26 (08) :4624-4634
[20]   Evaluation of mercury associations in two coals of different rank using physical separation procedures [J].
Lopez-Anton, M. Antonia ;
Diaz-Somoano, Mercedes ;
Garcia, Ana B. ;
Martinez-Tarazona, M. Rosa .
FUEL, 2006, 85 (10-11) :1389-1395