Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: scientific dream or reality?

被引:57
作者
Nezhat, Camran [1 ]
Lavie, Ofer [2 ]
Lemyre, Madeleine [1 ]
Unal, Ebru [1 ]
Nezhat, Ceana H. [1 ,3 ]
Nezhat, Farr [4 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Special Minimally Invas Surg, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Med, Carmel Med Ctr, Hafia, Israel
[3] Atlanta Ctr Special Minimally Invas Surg & Reprod, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Div Minimally Invas & Robot Surg, Dept Obstet, Div Oncol & Reprod Sci, New York, NY USA
关键词
Robotic-assisted laparoscopy; gynecologic surgery; da Vinci robot; MICROSURGICAL TUBAL ANASTOMOSIS; EXPERIENCE; HYSTERECTOMY; UROLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.070
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
Objective: To analyze the feasibility, safety, advantages, and disadvantages of using robotic technology for gynecologic surgeries in a large group of patients. Design: Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting: Tertiary endoscopic referral centers. Patient(s): Eighty-seven patients requiring laparoscopic treatments for benign gynecologic conditions. Intervention(s): Charts reviewed from robotic-assisted gynecologic operative laparoscopies. Main Outcome Measure(s): Length of surgery, time for robot assembly and disassembly, rate of conversion to laparotomies, and complications. Result(s): Between January 2006 and August 2007, 137 robotically assisted gynecologic procedures were performed in 87 patients. The da Vinci Surgical System was used. The average length of the surgeries was 205 minutes (60-420 ninutes). Assembly of the robot lasted 16 minutes (10-27 minutes) when disassembly took 2.5 minutes (2-6 minutes). There were no conversions to laparotomy. There were three complications. Conclusion(s): Robotic-assisted technology, in its present state, is enabling more surgeons to perform endoscopic surgery. Its advantages are 3D Vision and a faster learning curve for suturing and operating while sitting. It's an exciting enabling technology with a great future. (Fertil Steril (R) 2009;91:2620-2. (C)2009 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:2620 / 2622
页数:3
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
Laparoscopic robotic gynecologic surgery [J].
Advincula, AP ;
Falcone, T .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 31 (03) :599-+
[2]
Bargar WL, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P82
[3]
Robotic surgery in urology:: fact or fantasy? [J].
Binder, J ;
Bräutigam, R ;
Jonas, D ;
Bentas, W .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 94 (08) :1183-1187
[4]
Early experience with robotic technology for coronary artery surgery [J].
Boehm, DH ;
Reichenspurner, H ;
Gulbins, H ;
Detter, C ;
Meiser, B ;
Brenner, F ;
Habazettl, H ;
Reichart, B .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1999, 68 (04) :1542-1546
[5]
Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis:: a feasibility study [J].
Degueldre, M ;
Vandromme, J ;
Huong, PT ;
Cadière, GB .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 74 (05) :1020-1023
[6]
Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot [J].
Diaz-Arrastia, C ;
Jurnalov, C ;
Gomez, G ;
Townsend, C .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (09) :1271-1273
[7]
Current status of robotics in female urology and gynecology [J].
Elliott, DS ;
Chow, GK ;
Gettman, M .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 24 (02) :188-192
[8]
Robotics in gynecology [J].
Falcone, T ;
Goldberg, JM .
SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2003, 83 (06) :1483-+
[9]
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study [J].
Falcone, T ;
Goldberg, JM ;
Margossian, H ;
Stevens, L .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (05) :1040-1042
[10]
Computer-enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology [J].
Field, Jayson B. ;
Benoit, Michelle F. ;
Dinh, Tri A. ;
Diaz-Arrastia, Concepcion .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 21 (02) :244-246