Errors in interpreting the pretransfusion bedside compatibility test - An experimental study

被引:26
作者
Dujardin, PP
Salmi, LR
Ingrand, P
机构
[1] Univ Bordeaux 2, Inst Sante Publ Epidemiol & Dev, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
[2] CHU Grenoble, F-38043 Grenoble, France
[3] CHU La Miletrie, Dept Med Informat, Poitiers, France
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1423-0410.2000.7810037.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objective: Analysis of reports of incidents, involving ABO incompatibility suggests that the main problem is poor interpretation of the pretransfusion bedside compatibility test (PBCT). We studied sources of error as experienced by nurses as to the blood groups of donor blood and of the recipient. Materials and Methods: According to their seniority in the profession and on the ward, 48 nurses were randomly selected from four transfusion sectors of the University Hospital of Grenoble, France. Each nurse interpreted 24 photos of PBCTs, including some with procedural irregularities, and was asked to assess the compatibility of the blood types of the donor and the recipient. At random, half the nurses were provided with a diagram to facilitate interpretation. Results: The overall frequency of errors was 39.8%, Errors were fewer when the tests were interpreted as compatible (7.3%) or incompatible (6.3%), and when the nurse had been in the profession between 3 and 5 years and in the wa rd less than 3 yea rs (25.5%), or worked in hematology (34.7%) or anesthesia (36.5%). Use of the diagram limited the number of errors, provided the test was interpretable (22.2%). Conclusion: PBCTs cannot be considered a valid safety procedure. We need other, more effective methods to reduce the risk of incompatibility accidents. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 43
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COMPRENDRE UTILISER
[2]  
Armitage P., 1971, STAT METHODS MED RES
[3]   BEDSIDE BLOOD COMPATIBILITY TESTING [J].
BAGLIN, T ;
OUWEHAND, W ;
VOAK, D ;
WATERS, AH ;
GUNSON, HH ;
LLOYD, E .
LANCET, 1990, 336 (8724) :1196-1197
[4]  
*COMM EV MED TECHN, 1985, METH TECHN ASS
[5]  
Hosmer D. W., 1989, APPL LOGISTIC REGRES, DOI DOI 10.1097/00019514-200604000-00003
[6]   Reliability of the pretransfusion bedside compatibility test: association with transfusion practice and training [J].
Ingrand, P ;
Surer-Pierres, N ;
Houssay, D ;
Salmi, LR .
TRANSFUSION, 1998, 38 (11-12) :1030-1036
[7]  
JURON-DUPRAZ F, 1982, Revue Francaise de Transfusion et Immuno-Hematologie, V25, P439, DOI 10.1016/S0338-4535(82)80033-0
[8]   Immunohaemolytic transfusion reactions .3. A study of 61 cases [J].
LePennec, PY ;
Tissier, AM ;
Mannessier, L ;
Agulles, O ;
Babinet, J ;
Bidet, ML ;
BombailGirard, D ;
Cabaud, JJ ;
Cartron, J ;
Chiaroni, J ;
Desaint, C ;
Krause, C ;
Lamy, B ;
Meyer, F ;
Mortelecque, R ;
Nafissi, S ;
Rasongles, P ;
Schweitzer, B ;
Rouger, P .
TRANSFUSION CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 1996, 3 (03) :157-165
[9]   TECHNICAL CONDITIONS OF THE ULTIMATE PRETRANSFUSION CHECKING TESTS AT THE PATIENTS BEDSIDE [J].
LEPENNEC, PY ;
ROUGER, P .
REVUE FRANCAISE DE TRANSFUSION ET D HEMOBIOLOGIE, 1991, 34 (02) :167-171
[10]   ONE-YEAR USE OF THE BLOODLOC SYSTEM IN AN ORTHOPEDIC INSTITUTE [J].
MERCURILALI, F ;
INGHILLERI, G ;
COLOTTI, MT ;
PODICO, M ;
BIFFI, E ;
FARE, M ;
VINCI, A ;
SCALAMOGNA, R .
TRANSFUSION CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 1994, 1 (03) :227-230