Long-term follow-up confirms prognostic impact of PAI-1 and cathepsin D and L in primary breast cancer

被引:43
作者
Harbeck, N
Alt, U
Berger, U
Kates, R
Krüger, A
Thomssen, C
Jänicke, F
Graeff, H
Schmitt, M
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Med Stat & Epidemiol, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Expt Oncol, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[4] Univ Hamburg, Dept Obstet & Gynecol Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
PAI-2; uPA; cathepsin D-B-L; prognosis; breast cancel; invasion;
D O I
10.1177/172460080001500115
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
After long-term follow-up, the prognostic impact of the following proteolytic factors associated with tumor invasion and metastasis was evaluated in 276 primary breast cancer patients: uPA (urokinase-type plasminogen activator), PAI-I (uPA inhibitor type I), and cathepsins B, D and L. The median follow-up of patients still alive at the time of analysis was 109 months. To date 119 patients (43%) have relapsed and 117 (42%) have died. Antigen levels of uPA and PAI-I were determined by ELISA in detergent extracts; cathepsin B, D, and L content was determined in cytosol fractions of the primary tumor: cathepsin D by ELSA and cathepsin B and L by ELISA. In multivariate analysis (Cox model) for disease-free survival (DFS), lymph node status (p<0.001; RR=3.8), cathepsin L (p<0.001; RR=2.6) and PAI-I (p=0.027; RR=1.7) were significant factors in all patients. In addition to these factors, grading was significant for overall survival (OS). In another multivariate approach, CART(Classification And Regression Trees) analysis, lymph node statics (p<0.001) turned out to be the strongest discriminator for patients high risk of relapse. In the node-negative patient subset, PAI-I was the strongest risk group discriminator (p<0.001): in this subset, patients with low levels of both PAI-I and cathepsin D had a very low relapse rate of only 3.2% compared to 39% in the remaining node-negative patients. Irt node-positive patients cathepsin L gave the best risk group assessment (p=0.001). Irt conclusion, tumor-associated PAI-1 and cathepsins D and L provide significant, statistically independent prognostic information for DFS and OS in primary breast cancel; even after a median follow-up period of almost 10 years.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 83
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Andreasen PA, 1997, INT J CANCER, V72, P1, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970703)72:1<1::AID-IJC1>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-Z
[3]   Dissemination risk index based on plasminogen activator system components in primary breast cancer [J].
Bouchet, C ;
Hacène, K ;
Martin, PM ;
Becette, V ;
Tubiana-Hulin, M ;
Lasry, S ;
Oglobine, J ;
Spyratos, F .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (10) :3048-3057
[4]   Emerging roles for cysteine proteases in human biology [J].
Chapman, HA ;
Riese, RJ ;
Shi, GP .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 59 :63-88
[5]  
Della Porta P, 1999, ANTICANCER RES, V19, P3809
[6]  
DUFFY MJ, 1990, CANCER RES, V50, P6827
[7]   Urokinase plasminogen activator, a strong independent prognostic factor in breast cancer, analysed in steroid receptor cytosols with a luminometric immunoassay [J].
Ferno, M ;
Bendahl, PO ;
Borg, A ;
Brundell, J ;
Hirschberg, L ;
Olsson, H ;
Killander, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 32A (05) :793-801
[8]   CATHEPSIN-D, BOTH A PROGNOSTIC FACTOR AND A PREDICTIVE FACTOR FOR THE EFFECT OF ADJUVANT TAMOXIFEN IN BREAST-CANCER [J].
FERNO, M ;
BALDETORP, B ;
BORG, A ;
BROUILLET, JP ;
OLSSON, H ;
ROCHEFORT, H ;
SELLBERG, G ;
SIGURDSSON, H ;
KILLANDER, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 30A (14) :2042-2048
[9]   Relationship between cathepsin-D content and disease free survival in node-negative breast cancer patients: A meta-analysis [J].
Ferrandina, G ;
Scambia, G ;
Bardelli, F ;
Panici, PB ;
Mancuso, S ;
Messori, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 76 (05) :661-666
[10]   Prognostic significance of cathepsins B and L in primary human breast cancer [J].
Foekens, JA ;
Kos, J ;
Peters, HA ;
Krasovec, M ;
Look, MP ;
Cimerman, N ;
Meijer-van Gelder, ME ;
Henzen-Logmans, SC ;
van Putten, WLJ ;
Klijn, JGM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (03) :1013-1021