Infusion versus bolus of an ultrasound contrast agent - In vivo dose-response measurements of BR1

被引:66
作者
Correas, JM
Burns, PN
Lai, XM
Qi, XL
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Necker, Dept Radiol, F-75743 Paris 15, France
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Sunnybrook & Womens Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
ultrasound contrast agents; Doppler intensitometry; quantification; infusion protocols;
D O I
10.1097/00004424-200001000-00008
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. TO determine the efficacy of an ultrasound contrast agent infusion using Doppler intensitometry estimation of backscatter enhancement in blood, METHODS. Multiple intravenous injections of BR1 (SonoVue) were performed in chronic dog studies, using bolus (0.05-2 mL) and infusion (3-40 mL/h during 6 minutes) administration. The pulsed Doppler signal from the femoral artery was recorded and analyzed for mean Doppler power and integrated fractional enhancement, RESULTS. For bolus injection, time-intensity curves exhibited a rapid first pass (peak 30 dB for 0.45 mL) followed by a slower washout. Integrated fractional enhancement exhibited a Linear relation with the dose (R-2 = 0.99). For infusion administration, peak enhancement increased with the infusion rate from 8 to 22 dB, At rates exceeding 30 mL/h, the enhancement was stable with a plateau-like pattern. CONCLUSIONS. Infusion of BR1 is easily achieved and allows the duration of enhancement to be increased as long as desired. Stable enhancement is obtained for rates greater than 30 mL/h.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 79
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Prolongation and optimization of Doppler enhancement with a microbubble US contrast agent by using continuous infusion:: Preliminary experience [J].
Albrecht, T ;
Urbank, A ;
Mahler, M ;
Bauer, A ;
Doré, CJ ;
Blomley, MJK ;
Cosgrove, DO ;
Schlief, R .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (02) :339-347
[2]  
BURNS PN, 1990, IEEE ENG MED BIOL SO, V1, P322
[3]  
Correas JM, 1996, CLIN RADIOL, V51, P11
[4]   Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of native and transplanted kidney diseases [J].
Correas, JM ;
Hélénon, O ;
Moreau, JF .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (Suppl 3) :S394-S400
[5]   SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF A NEW TRANSPULMONARY ULTRASOUND CONTRAST AGENT - INITIAL MULTICENTER CLINICAL-RESULTS [J].
FEINSTEIN, SB ;
CHEIRIF, J ;
TENCATE, FJ ;
SILVERMAN, PR ;
HEIDENREICH, PA ;
DICK, C ;
DESIR, RM ;
ARMSTRONG, WF ;
QUINONES, MA ;
SHAH, PM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1990, 16 (02) :316-324
[6]  
Fritzsch T., 1994, ULTRASOUND MED BIOL, V20, pS137
[7]  
QUAY SC, 1994, J ULTRAS MED, V13, pS9
[8]  
Schlief R, 1990, Echocardiography, V7, P61, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-8175.1990.tb00349.x
[9]   BR1 - A NEW ULTRASONOGRAPHIC CONTRAST AGENT BASED ON SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE-FILLED MICROBUBBLES [J].
SCHNEIDER, M ;
ARDITI, M ;
BARRAU, MB ;
BROCHOT, J ;
BROILLET, A ;
VENTRONE, R ;
YAN, F .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1995, 30 (08) :451-457
[10]   POLYMERIC MICROBALLOONS AS ULTRASOUND CONTRAST AGENTS - PHYSICAL AND ULTRASONIC PROPERTIES COMPARED WITH SONICATED ALBUMIN [J].
SCHNEIDER, M ;
BUSSAT, P ;
BARRAU, MB ;
ARDITI, M ;
YAN, F ;
HYBL, E .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1992, 27 (02) :134-139