The effects on ovarian activity of a monophasic oral contraceptive with 100 μg levonorgestrel and 20 μg ethinyl estradiol

被引:33
作者
Coney, P
DelConte, A
机构
[1] So Illinois Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Springfield, IL 62794 USA
[2] Wyeth Ayerst Res, Radnor, PA USA
关键词
ethinyl estradiol; levonorgestrel; oral contraceptive; ovarian activity;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70364-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
An open-label, single-center, noncomparative study was conducted to determine the effects of a monophasic oral contraceptive containing 100 mu g levonorgestrel and 20 mu g ethinyl estradiol on ovarian activity. The subjects were 26 healthy women 20 to 35 years of age who had normal ovulatory cycles and were not at risk for becoming pregnant. For 3 treatment cycles, they took 1 tablet of active drug daily for 21 days followed by placebo tablets for 7 days. Follicle diameters and serum progesterone and 17 beta-estradiol levels were measured before, during, and after treatment. In 2 (2.7%) of 73 cycles, luteinized unruptured follicles were present and in another 2 (2.7%) cycles, ovulation was confirmed by the disappearance of the enlarged iollicle. Ovarian activity, as reflected by mean serum progesterone levels, was restored after treatment. The results of this study are in agreement with those of other studies that showed suppression of ovarian activity in women treated with a monophasic oral contraceptive containing 100 mu g levonorgestrel and 20 mu g ethinyl estradiol. These results indicate that low-dose 100 mu g levonorgestrel and 20 mu g ethinyl estradiol given for 21 days is effective in suppressing ovarian activity and they confirm the contraceptive efficacy observed in clinical trials (Pearl index of 0.8).
引用
收藏
页码:S53 / S58
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
APELO R, 1975, FERTIL STERIL, V26, P283
[2]   A new low-dose monophasic combination oral contraceptive (Alesse(TM)) with levonorgestrel 100 mu g and ethinyl estradiol 20 mu g [J].
Archer, DF ;
Maheux, R ;
DelConte, A ;
OBrien, FB ;
Adams, D ;
Appel, T ;
Brown, D ;
Carr, B ;
Chenault, B ;
Connell, E ;
Davila, G ;
Donovan, S ;
Faguant, R ;
Glick, H ;
Grimes, D ;
Hanson, M ;
Harris, JW ;
Hume, J ;
Kasparian, S ;
Katz, D ;
Lifson, MS ;
Mercer, L ;
Merritt, D ;
Moore, D ;
Schade, G ;
Spellacy, W ;
Stephenson, CD ;
Stewart, SK ;
Thorp, JM ;
Varner, E ;
Wallach, E ;
Blanchet, P ;
Boroditsky, R ;
Choquette, P ;
Guilbert, E ;
Lefebvre, Y ;
Powell, MG ;
Ross, S ;
Senikas, V ;
Young, R ;
Yuzpe, A .
CONTRACEPTION, 1997, 55 (03) :139-144
[3]  
ARNT IC, 1997, FERTIL STERIL, V28, P549
[4]  
BYE PGT, 1976, OBSTET GEN SCAND S, V54, P61
[5]  
DRIFE J, 1990, Advances in Contraception, V6, P15
[6]   A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF 2 MONOPHASIC LOW-DOSE ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVES ON THE INHIBITION OF OVULATION [J].
FITZGERALD, C ;
FEICHTINGER, W ;
SPONA, J ;
ELSTEIN, M ;
LUDICKE, F ;
MULLER, U ;
WILLIAMS, C .
ADVANCES IN CONTRACEPTION, 1994, 10 (01) :5-18
[7]   ULTRASOUND EVALUATION OF OVARIAN ACTIVITY UNDER ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVES [J].
HOOGLAND, HJ ;
SKOUBY, SO .
CONTRACEPTION, 1993, 47 (06) :583-590
[8]  
JEFFCOATE TNA, 1970, BRIT MED J, V1, P293
[9]  
MISHELL DR, 1993, J REPROD MED, V38, P1021
[10]  
SARTORETTO JN, 1974, REV BRAS CLIN TERAP, V3, P399