Secondary structure determines protein topology

被引:32
作者
Fleming, Patrick J. [1 ]
Gong, Haipeng [1 ]
Rose, George D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, TC Jenkins Dept Biophys, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
protein topology; protein folding; secondary structure; hydrogen bonding; confinement;
D O I
10.1110/ps.062305106
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Using a test set of 13 small, compact proteins, we demonstrate that a remarkably simple protocol can capture native topology from secondary structure information alone, in the absence of long-range interactions. It has been a long-standing open question whether such information is sufficient to determine a protein's fold. Indeed, even the far simpler problem of reconstructing the three-dimensional structure of a protein from its exact backbone torsion angles has remained a difficult challenge owing to the small, but cumulative, deviations from ideality in backbone planarity, which, if ignored, cause large errors in structure. As a familiar example, a small change in an elbow angle causes a large displacement at the end of your arm; the longer the arm, the larger the displacement. Here, correct secondary structure assignments (alpha-helix, beta-strand, beta-turn, polyproline II, coil) were used to constrain polypeptide backbone chains devoid of side chains, and the most stable folded conformations were determined, using Monte Carlo simulation. Just three terms were used to assess stability: molecular compaction, steric exclusion, and hydrogen bonding. For nine of the 13 proteins, this protocol restricts the main chain to a surprisingly small number of energetically favorable topologies, with the native one prominent among them.
引用
收藏
页码:1829 / 1834
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Strategy for supplementing structure calculations using limited data with hydrophobic distance restraints [J].
Alexandrescu, AT .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 56 (01) :117-129
[2]   PRINCIPLES THAT GOVERN FOLDING OF PROTEIN CHAINS [J].
ANFINSEN, CB .
SCIENCE, 1973, 181 (4096) :223-230
[3]   Is protein folding hierarchic? II. Folding intermediates and transition states [J].
Baldwin, RL ;
Rose, GD .
TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 24 (02) :77-83
[4]   Is protein folding hierarchic? I. Local structure and peptide folding [J].
Baldwin, RL ;
Rose, GD .
TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 24 (01) :26-33
[5]   Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins [J].
Bradley, P ;
Misura, KMS ;
Baker, D .
SCIENCE, 2005, 309 (5742) :1868-1871
[6]   The ASTRAL Compendium in 2004 [J].
Chandonia, JM ;
Hon, G ;
Walker, NS ;
Lo Conte, L ;
Koehl, P ;
Levitt, M ;
Brenner, SE .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2004, 32 :D189-D192
[7]   Shaping up the protein folding funnel by local interaction: Lesson from a structure prediction study [J].
Chikenji, G ;
Fujitsuka, Y ;
Takada, S .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2006, 103 (09) :3141-3146
[8]  
De Gennes PG., 1979, SCALING CONCEPTS POL
[9]   Open source clustering software [J].
de Hoon, MJL ;
Imoto, S ;
Nolan, J ;
Miyano, S .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 20 (09) :1453-1454
[10]  
DeLano WL, 2022, The PyMOL molecular graphics system