Preoperative versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis - A prospective randomized trial

被引:117
作者
Chang, L
Lo, S
Stabile, BE
Lewis, RJ
Toosie, K
de Virgilio, C
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Harbor Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Torrance, CA 90509 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Harbor Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Torrance, CA 90509 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Harbor Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Torrance, CA 90509 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000658-200001000-00012
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To determine whether endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and common bile duct (CBD) stone extraction should be performed routinely before surgery or selectively after surgery in patients with mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis. Summary Background Data The role and timing of ERCP in mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis remains controversial. Routine preoperative ERCP identifies persisting CBD stones but carries risks of complications and may delay definitive care; Selective post operative ERCP, performed only if a CBD stone is seen on intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), avoids unnecessary ERCP but risks unsuccessful stone extraction. Methods A prospective, randomized study of consecutive patients with gallstone pancreatitis was conducted. Using previously determined criteria, patients with acute cholangitis or necrotizing pancreatitis were excluded. Patients considered at high risk for persisting CBD stones (CBD size greater than or equal to 8 mm on admission ultrasound, serum total bilirubin greater than or equal to 1.7 mg/dL, or serum amylase greater than or equal to 150 U/L on hospital day 4) were randomly assigned to routine preoperative ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy with selective postoperative ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy only if a CBD stone was present on IOC. Primary end points were costs, length of hospital stay, and the combined treatment failure rates (failure of diagnostic ERCP and IOC, complications of ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy, and complications of surgery). Results One hundred fifty-four consecutive patients with gallstone pancreatitis were evaluated prospectively for study eligibility. Sixty patients met the randomization criteria. Thirty patients were randomized to routine preoperative ERCP and 29 patients to selective postoperative ERCP (I patient refused). Age, admission laboratory values, and APACHE II and Imrie scores were similar in both groups, By protocol, ERCP was performed in all patients in the preoperative ERCP group. In the postoperative ERCP group, ERCP was necessary in only 7 of 29 patients (24%). Mean hospital stay was significantly longer in the routine preoperative ERCP group (11.7 days) than in the selective postoperative ERCP group (9.0 days). Mean total cost was higher in the preoperative ERCP group ($9,426) than in the postoperative ERCP group ($7,798). The combined treatment failure rate was 10% in both groups. Conclusions In patients with mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis without cholangitis, selective postoperative ERCP and CBD stone extraction is associated with a shorter hospital stay, less cost, no increase in combined treatment failure rate, and significant reduction in ERCP use compared with routine preoperative ERCP.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 87
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]
Chang L, 1998, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V93, P527
[2]
DEVIRGILIO C, 1994, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V129, P909
[3]
EARLY TREATMENT OF ACUTE BILIARY PANCREATITIS BY ENDOSCOPIC PAPILLOTOMY [J].
FAN, ST ;
LAI, ECS ;
MOK, FPT ;
LO, CM ;
ZHENG, SS ;
WONG, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 328 (04) :228-232
[4]
Early ERCP and papillotomy compared with conservative treatment for acute biliary pancreatitis [J].
Folsch, UR ;
Nitsche, R ;
Ludtke, R ;
Hilgers, RA ;
Creutzfeldt, W .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (04) :237-242
[5]
Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy [J].
Freeman, ML ;
Nelson, DB ;
Sherman, S ;
Haber, GB ;
Herman, ME ;
Dorsher, PJ ;
Moore, JP ;
Fennerty, MB ;
Ryan, ME ;
Shaw, MJ ;
Lande, JD ;
Pheley, AM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (13) :909-918
[6]
LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES - THE UTILITY OF PLANNED PERIOPERATIVE ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY AND SPHINCTEROTOMY - EXPERIENCE WITH 63 PATIENTS [J].
GRAHAM, SM ;
FLOWERS, JL ;
SCOTT, TR ;
BAILEY, RW ;
SCOVILL, WA ;
ZUCKER, KA ;
IMBEMBO, AL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1993, 218 (01) :61-67
[7]
CONTROLLED TRIAL OF URGENT ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY AND ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY VERSUS CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT FOR ACUTE-PANCREATITIS DUE TO GALLSTONES [J].
NEOPTOLEMOS, JP ;
LONDON, NJ ;
JAMES, D ;
CARRLOCKE, DL ;
BAILEY, IA ;
FOSSARD, DP .
LANCET, 1988, 2 (8618) :979-983
[8]
NEOPTOLEMOS JP, 1986, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V121, P697
[9]
ORIA A, 1991, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V126, P566
[10]
BILIARY SURGERY IN THE SAME ADMISSION FOR GALLSTONE-ASSOCIATED ACUTE-PANCREATITIS [J].
OSBORNE, DH ;
IMRIE, CW ;
CARTER, DC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1981, 68 (11) :758-761