A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: a retrospective cohort study

被引:69
作者
Ho, Kwok M.
Dobb, Geoffrey J.
Knuiman, Matthew
Finn, Judith
Lee, Kok Y.
Webb, Steven A. R.
机构
[1] Royal Perth Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Perth, WA 6000, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Populat Hlth, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Sch Med & Pharmacol, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
来源
CRITICAL CARE | 2006年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1186/cc3913
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score is widely used in the intensive care unit (ICU) as a scoring system for research and clinical audit purposes. Physiological data for calculation of the APACHE II score are derived from the worst values in the first 24 hours after admission to the ICU. The collection of physiological data on admission only is probably logistically easier, and this approach is used by some ICUs. This study compares the performance of APACHE II scores calculated using admission data with those obtained from the worst values in the first 24 hours. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data from a tertiary ICU. There were no missing physiological data and follow-up for mortality was available for all patients in the database. The admission and the worst 24-hour physiological variables were used to generate the admission APACHE II score and the worst 24-hour APACHE II score, and the corresponding predicted mortality, respectively. Results There were 11,107 noncardiac surgery ICU admissions during 11 years from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 2003. The mean admission and the worst 24-hour APACHE II score were 12.7 and 15.4, and the derived predicted mortality estimates were 15.5% and 19.3%, respectively. The actual hospital mortality was 16.3%. The overall discrimination ability, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, of the admission APACHE II model (83.8%, 95% confidence interval = 82.9 - 84.7) and the worst 24-hour APACHE II model (84.6%, 95% confidence interval = 83.7 - 85.5) was not significantly different ( P = 1.00). Conclusion Substitution of the worst 24-hour physiological variables with the admission physiological variables to calculate the admission APACHE II score maintains the overall discrimination ability of the traditional APACHE II model. The admission APACHE II model represents a potential alternative model to the worst 24-hour APACHE II model in critically ill nontrauma patients.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Identifying potentially ineffective care in the sickest critically ill patients on the third ICU day
    Afessa, B
    Keegan, MT
    Mohammad, Z
    Finkielman, JD
    Peters, SG
    [J]. CHEST, 2004, 126 (06) : 1905 - 1909
  • [2] Scoring system fatigue ... and the search for a way forward
    Angus, DC
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (06) : 2145 - 2146
  • [3] Assessment of six mortality prediction models in patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock to the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study
    Arabi, Y
    Al Shirawi, N
    Memish, Z
    Venkatesh, S
    Al-Shimemeri, A
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2003, 7 (05) : R116 - R122
  • [4] PHYSIOLOGICAL SCORING SYSTEMS AND AUDIT
    BOYD, O
    GROUNDS, RM
    [J]. LANCET, 1993, 341 (8860) : 1573 - 1574
  • [5] Acute respiratory failure secondary to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated in the intensive care unit: a long term follow up study
    Breen, D
    Churches, T
    Hawker, F
    Torzillo, PJ
    [J]. THORAX, 2002, 57 (01) : 29 - 33
  • [6] An analysis of excess mortality not predicted to occur by APACHE III in an Australian level III intensive care unit
    Buist, M
    Gould, T
    Hagley, S
    Webb, R
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2000, 28 (02) : 171 - 177
  • [7] Predicting mortality in patients suffering from prolonged critical illness - An assessment of four severity-of-illness measures
    Carson, SS
    Bach, PB
    [J]. CHEST, 2001, 120 (03) : 928 - 933
  • [8] Predicting outcome after multiple trauma: which scoring system?
    Chawda, MN
    Hildebrand, F
    Pape, HC
    Giannoudis, PV
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2004, 35 (04): : 347 - 358
  • [9] Adverse effect on a referral intensive care unit's performance of accepting patients transferred from another intensive care unit
    Combes, A
    Luyt, CE
    Trouillet, JL
    Chastre, J
    Gibert, C
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (04) : 705 - 710
  • [10] ERRORS AND BIAS IN USING PREDICTIVE SCORING SYSTEMS
    COWEN, JS
    KELLEY, MA
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 1994, 10 (01) : 53 - 72