Effectiveness, tolerability, and impact on quality of life of the 5% lidocaine patch in diabetic polyneuropathy

被引:121
作者
Barbano, RL
Herrmann, DN
Hart-Gouleau, S
Pennella-Vaughan, J
Lodewick, PA
Dworkin, RH
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Neurol, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Anesthesiol, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[3] So Drug Res, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archneur.61.6.914
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The treatment of painful diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) is often inadequate and frequently limited by the systemic adverse effects of medications, necessitating the evaluation of novel treatments. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and impact on quality of life of the 5% lidocaine patch in painful diabetic polyneuropathy. Design: Open-label, flexible-dosing, 3-week study with a 5-week extension. Setting: Outpatient clinics and clinical research centers Patients: Volunteer sample of 56 patients with clinically defined painful diabetic polyneuropathy of longer than 3 months' duration. Intervention: The 5% lidocaine patch, with a maximum of 4 patches daily for 18 hours. Main Outcome Measures: Change in mean daily pain diary ratings from baseline to week 3. Secondary end points included assessments of safety, tolerability, and quality of life. Results: Patients with painful diabetic polyneuropathy showed significant improvements in pain and quality-of-life outcome measures during a 3-week treatment period. These benefits were maintained in a subgroup of patients treated for an additional 5 weeks, during which taper of concomitant analgesic therapy was permitted. Adverse events were minimal, and systemic accumulation of lidocaine did not occur. Conclusions: Up to four 5% lidocaine patches for up to 18 h/d are well tolerated in patients with painful diabetic polyneuropathy, significantly improve pain and quality-of-life ratings, and may allow tapering of concomitant analgesic therapy. Given the open-label design of this trial, a randomized controlled trial is necessary to confirm these results.
引用
收藏
页码:914 / 918
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HDB PAIN ASSESSMENT
[2]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION [J].
BECK, AT ;
ERBAUGH, J ;
WARD, CH ;
MOCK, J ;
MENDELSOHN, M .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) :561-&
[3]   Topical lidocaine patch relieves a variety of neuropathic pain conditions: An open-label study [J].
Devers, A ;
Galer, BS .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2000, 16 (03) :205-208
[4]   Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Young, JP ;
LaMoreaux, L ;
Werth, JL ;
Poole, RM .
PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) :149-158
[5]   Topical lidocaine patch relieves postherpetic neuralgia more effectively than a vehicle topical patch: results of an enriched enrollment study [J].
Galer, BS ;
Rowbotham, MC ;
Perander, J ;
Friedman, E .
PAIN, 1999, 80 (03) :533-538
[6]  
Gammaitoni AR, 2002, ANN PHARMACOTHER, V36, P236
[7]  
MCNAIR DM, 1981, PROFILE MOOD STATE M
[8]   THE SHORT-FORM MCGILL PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
MELZACK, R .
PAIN, 1987, 30 (02) :191-197
[9]  
RODEN DM, 2001, GOODMAN GILMANS PHAR, P933
[10]   Is postherpetic neuralgia more than one disorder? [J].
Rowbotham, MC ;
Petersen, KL ;
Fields, HL .
PAIN FORUM, 1998, 7 (04) :231-237