Preferences of husbands and wives for prostate cancer screening

被引:46
作者
Volk, RJ
Cantor, SB
Spann, SJ
Cass, AR
Cardenas, MP
Warren, MM
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS,MED BRANCH,DIV UROL,DEPT SURG,GALVESTON,TX 77555
[2] UNIV TEXAS,MD ANDERSON CANC CTR,DEPT MED SPECIALTIES,GEN INTERNAL MED SECT,HOUSTON,TX 77030
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archfami.6.1.72
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The benefits of screening for prostate cancer are uncertain. Outcomes of treatment are particularly important to couples because they challenge the most intimate aspects of a couple's relationship. This study used clinical decision analysis to explore the preferences of 10 couples for prostate cancer screening. The decision-analytic model found that 7 of 10 husbands preferred the no screening strategy, while 9 of 10 wives preferred screening for their husbands. Wives associated little burden with complications of treatment, preferring to maximize their husbands' quantity of life regardless of complications. The issue of who is the decision maker is paramount in the case of prostate cancer screening. Optimal screening strategies may differ for husbands and wives. Guidelines for prostate cancer screening and management should consider assessing preferences on an individual couple basis.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 76
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
*AM CANC SOC, 1991, CANC FACTS FIG 1991, P5
[2]  
*AM UR ASS, 1995, POL STAT AM UR ASS I
[4]   WHOSE UTILITIES FOR DECISION-ANALYSIS [J].
BOYD, NF ;
SUTHERLAND, HJ ;
HEASMAN, KZ ;
TRITCHLER, DL ;
CUMMINGS, BJ .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1990, 10 (01) :58-67
[5]  
CANTOR SB, 1995, J FAM PRACTICE, V41, P33
[6]  
Centers for Disease Control (CDC), 1992, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V41, P401
[7]   EARLY DETECTION AND SCREENING FOR PROSTATIC-CANCER [J].
CHODAK, GW .
UROLOGY, 1989, 34 (04) :10-12
[8]   SCREENING FOR PROSTATE-CANCER - THE DEBATE CONTINUES [J].
CHODAK, GW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (10) :813-814
[9]  
COONER W H, 1989, Journal of Endourology, V3, P193, DOI 10.1089/end.1989.3.193
[10]  
Fleming C, 1993, JAMA, V269, P2650