Biomechanical comparison of three stand-alone lumbar cages - a three-dimensional finite element analysis

被引:17
作者
Chen, Shih-Hao [1 ,2 ]
Chiang, Ming-Chieh [3 ]
Lin, Jin-Fu [4 ]
Lin, Shang-Chih [5 ]
Hung, Ching-Hua [3 ]
机构
[1] Tzu Chi Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Taichung, Taiwan
[2] Tzu Chi Univ, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
[4] Han Chiung Clin, BoneCare Orthoped Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Grad Inst Biomed Engn, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
ALIF; Anterior lumbar interbody fusion; Stand-alone cage; Finite element analysis; ESTABLISHED FIXATION TECHNIQUES; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION; INTERBODY FUSION; FOLLOW-UP; SPINE; DISC; BONE; MECHANICS; STRESSES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2474-14-281
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Background: For anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), stand-alone cages can be supplemented with vertebral plate, locking screws, or threaded cylinder to avoid the use of posterior fixation. Intuitively, the plate, screw, and cylinder aim to be embedded into the vertebral bodies to effectively immobilize the cage itself. The kinematic and mechanical effects of these integrated components on the lumbar construct have not been extensively studied. A nonlinearly lumbar finite-element model was developed and validated to investigate the biomechanical differences between three stand-alone (Latero, SynFix, and Stabilis) and SynCage-Open plus transpedicular fixation. All four cages were instrumented at the L3-4 level. Methods: The lumbar models were subjected to the follower load along the lumbar column and the moment at the lumbar top to produce flexion (FL), extension (EX), left/right lateral bending (LLB, RLB), and left/right axial rotation (LAR, RAR). A 10 Nm moment was applied to obtain the six physiological motions in all models. The comparison indices included disc range of motion (ROM), facet contact force, and stresses of the annulus and implants. Results: At the surgical level, the SynCage-open model supplemented with transpedicular fixation decreased ROM (>76%) greatly; while the SynFix model decreased ROM 56-72%, the Latero model decreased ROM 36-91%, in all motions as compared with the INT model. However, the Stabilis model decreased ROM slightly in extension (11%), lateral bending (21%), and axial rotation (34%). At the adjacent levels, there were no obvious differences in ROM and annulus stress among all instrumented models. Conclusions: ALIF instrumentation with the Latero or SynFix cage provides an acceptable stability for clinical use without the requirement of additional posterior fixation. However, the Stabilis cage is not favored in extension and lateral bending because of insufficient stabilization.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
ADAMS MA, 1982, INT ORTHOP, V6, P249
[2]
Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Adult Low-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: Minimum 3 Years of Follow-up [J].
Bae, Jun Seok ;
Lee, Sang-Ho ;
Kim, Jin-Sung ;
Jung, Byungjoo ;
Choi, Gun .
NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 67 (06) :1600-1607
[3]
Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F Cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system - Two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Clinical Trial [J].
Brantigan, JW ;
Steffee, AD ;
Lewis, ML ;
Quinn, LM ;
Persenaire, JM .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (11) :1437-1446
[4]
A new stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion device: Biomechanical comparison with established fixation techniques [J].
Cain, CMJ ;
Schleicher, P ;
Gerlach, R ;
Pflugmacher, R ;
Scholz, M ;
Kandziora, F .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (23) :2631-2636
[5]
COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR OF BONE AS A 2-PHASE POROUS STRUCTURE [J].
CARTER, DR ;
HAYES, WC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1977, 59 (07) :954-962
[6]
Biomechanical comparison of a new stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion cage with established fixation techniques - A three-dimensional finite element analysis [J].
Chen S.-H. ;
Tai C.-L. ;
Lin C.-Y. ;
Hsieh P.-H. ;
Chen W.-P. .
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 9 (1)
[7]
Biomechanical comparison between lumbar disc arthroplasty and fusion [J].
Chen, Shih-Hao ;
Zhong, Zheng-Cheng ;
Chen, Chen-Sheng ;
Chen, Wen-Jer ;
Hung, Chinghua .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2009, 31 (02) :244-253
[8]
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Stand-Alone Interbody Cage in Treatment of Lumbar Intervertebral Foraminal Stenosis : Comparative Study of Two Different Types of Cages [J].
Cho, Chul-Bum ;
Ryu, Kyeong-Sik ;
Park, Chun-Kun .
JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 47 (05) :352-357
[9]
Stand-alone cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of high-degree degenerative disc disease: design of a new device for an "old" technique. A prospective study on a series of 116 patients [J].
Costa, Francesco ;
Sassi, Marco ;
Ortolina, Alessandro ;
Cardia, Andrea ;
Assietti, Roberto ;
Zerbi, Alberto ;
Lorenzetti, Martin ;
Galbusera, Fabio ;
Fornari, Maurizio .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 :46-56
[10]
Edwards WT, 2001, SPINE, V26, P1753