The Case-to-Case Variability of the Predictability of Precipitation by a Storm-Scale Ensemble Forecasting System

This paper analyzes the case-to-case variability of the predictability of precipitation by a storm-scale ensemble forecasting (SSEF) system. Relationships are sought between ensemble spread and quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) skill, and the characteristics of an event, such as the strength of the quasigeostrophic forcing for ascent, the presence of convective equilibrium, and the spatial extent of the precipitation system. It is found that most of the case-to-case variability of predictability is explained by the spatial coverage of the system. The relationship between convection and large-scale forcing seems to affect predictability mostly during the afternoon hours. While the relationships are weak for the entire dataset, two distinct types of cases are identified: widespread and diurnally forced cases. The loss of predictability at small scales, the effect of the radar data assimilation, and the comparison between forecasts from the SSEF and Lagrangian persistence forecasts are analyzed separately for these two types of cases. Despite overall predictability being better than average for the widespread cases, the loss of predictability with forecast time and spatial scale is just as rapid as for the other cases. For the diurnally forced cases, the radar data assimilation causes larger differences between the precipitation fields corresponding to the assimilating and nonassimilating members than for the widespread cases. However, the effect of radar data assimilation on QPF skill is similar for both types of cases. Also, for the diurnal cases, the models with radar data assimilation outperform very rapidly (after 2 h) the Lagrangian persistence forecasts.