Relative economic incentives for hydrogen from nuclear, renewable, and fossil energy sources

被引:24
作者
Gorensek, Maximilian B. [1 ]
Forsberg, Charles W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Westinghouse Savannah River Co, Savannah River Lab, Aiken, SC 29808 USA
[2] MIT, Dept Nucl Sci & Engn, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
Hydrogen; Production; Economics; Nuclear; Renewable; Fossil; Comparison;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.07.083
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The specific hydrogen market determines the value of hydrogen from different sources. Each hydrogen production technology has its own distinct characteristics. For example, steam reforming of natural gas produces only hydrogen. In contrast, nuclear and solar hydrogen production facilities produce hydrogen together with oxygen as a by-product or co-product. For a user who needs both oxygen and hydrogen, the value of hydrogen from nuclear and solar plants is higher than that from a fossil plant because "free" oxygen is produced as a by-product. Six factors that impact the relative economics of fossil, nuclear, and solar hydrogen production to the customer are identified: oxygen by-product, avoidance of carbon dioxide emissions, hydrogen transport costs, storage costs, availability of low-cost heat, and institutional factors. These factors imply that different hydrogen production technologies will be competitive in different markets and that the first markets for nuclear and solar hydrogen will be those markets in which they have a unique competitive advantage. These secondary economic factors are described and quantified in terms of dollars per kilogram of hydrogen. (C) 2008 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4237 / 4242
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
BAADE WF, 2005, KIRK OTHMER ENCY CHE, V13, P759
[2]  
Cox J.D., 1984, CODATA KEY VALUES TH, P1
[3]  
Dietert J.A., 2000, Underground natural gas storage
[4]  
DOE, 2007, HYDR COAL PROGR RES
[5]  
*EN INF ADM, 2004, PETR IND AN BRIEFS E
[6]  
EUTCH J, 2007, FUTURE COAL OPTIONS
[7]  
FORSBERG CW, 2007, P INT TOP M SAF TECH, P18
[8]  
FORSBERG CW, 2007, P INT TOP M SAF TECH, P40
[9]  
OCHS TL, 2007, P 32 INT TECHN C COA, P31
[10]  
Ohama T., 2006, P 35 TURB S HOUST, P89