Assessing smallest detectable change over time in continuous structural outcome measures:: Application to radiological change in knee osteoarthritis

被引:54
作者
Ravaud, P
Giraudeau, B
Auleley, GR
Edouard-Noël, R
Dougados, M
Chastang, C
机构
[1] Hop Cochin, Rhumatol Clin, F-75674 Paris 14, France
[2] Univ Paris 05, Paris, France
[3] Fac Med, Ctr Rech Clin, Tours, France
[4] Hop St Louis, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, Tours, France
关键词
cutoffs; continuous structural outcome measure; joint space width measurement; osteoarthritis; smallest detectable change over time; reproducibility;
D O I
10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00109-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Interpreting changes in continuous structural outcome measures is a common problem in clinical research and in daily practice. We propose a method for estimating whether difference observed between two successive measures in an individual constitutes a statistically relevant change or a change induced by variability. This statistically relevant change is based on an analysis of reproducibility. The continuous structural outcome measure investigated as an example was joint space width (JSW) measurement on standard X-rays, which is known to be the primary end-point for assessing structural osteoarthritis progression. The results of the present study demonstrate that cutoffs are closely dependent on all sources of variabilities in JSW measurement such as joint positioning, radiographic procedure, and the measurement process itself. Therefore, we suggest to determine cutoffs for each study using a representative sample of the population studied and using the procedures and methods of measurement of the specific study. This approach may easily be extended to other continuous structural outcome measures. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1225 / 1230
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis: Recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritis Research Society - Results from a workshop [J].
Altman, R ;
Brandt, K ;
Hochberg, M ;
MOskowitz, R ;
Bellamy, N ;
Bloch, DA ;
Buckwalter, J ;
Dougados, M ;
Ehrlich, G ;
Lequesne, M ;
Lohmander, S ;
Murphy, WA ;
RosarioJansen, T ;
Schwartz, B ;
Trippel, S .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 1996, 4 (04) :217-243
[2]  
Bellamy N, 1997, J RHEUMATOL, V24, P799
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]  
British Standard Institution, 1979, 5497 BS 1
[5]   QUANTITATIVE RADIOGRAPHY OF OSTEOARTHRITIS [J].
BUCKLANDWRIGHT, JC .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1994, 53 (04) :268-275
[6]   INDEXES AND BOUNDARIES FOR QUANTITATIVE SIGNIFICANCE IN STATISTICAL DECISIONS [J].
BURNAND, B ;
KERNAN, WN ;
FEINSTEIN, AR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (12) :1273-1284
[7]  
DIEPPE P, 1993, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V32, P595
[8]  
Genant HK, 1996, J BONE MINER RES, V11, P707
[9]  
*GROUP RESP ETH EX, 1995, ANN RHEUM DIS, V55, P552
[10]   Interpreting treatment effects in randomised trials [J].
Guyatt, GH ;
Juniper, EF ;
Walter, SD ;
Griffith, LE ;
Goldstein, RS .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7132) :690-693