JEM Spotlight: Monitoring the treatment efficiency of a full scale ozonation on a sewage treatment plant with a mode-of-action based test battery

被引:78
作者
Escher, Beate I. [1 ,2 ]
Bramaz, Nadine [1 ]
Ort, Christoph [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Aquat Sci & Technol Eawag, CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland
[2] Univ Queensland, Natl Res Ctr Environm Toxicol EnTox, Brisbane, Qld 4108, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, AWMC, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING | 2009年 / 11卷 / 10期
关键词
WASTE-WATER EFFLUENTS; ORGANIC-CARBON AOC; ESTROGENIC ACTIVITY; IN-VITRO; ADVANCED OXIDATION; ACTIVATED CARBON; AQUEOUS OZONE; REMOVAL; PHARMACEUTICALS; MICROPOLLUTANTS;
D O I
10.1039/b907093a
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Tertiary treatment of wastewater with ozone is a promising technique for removing residual micropollutants that remain after secondary biological treatment. We monitored the performance of a full-scale ozonation reactor on a sewage treatment plant in Switzerland with a screening battery of bioassays. Six toxicity endpoints were selected that covered non-specific toxicity, as well as selected receptor-mediated modes of action and reactive toxicity. Non-specific toxicity was assessed with two bioassays, the bioluminescence inhibition of the marine luminescent bacterium Vibrio Fischeri and the growth inhibition of the green algae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Treatment efficiency was around 90% for the secondary treatment, but only 65% and 76% for the ozonation step in the two nonspecific endpoints, respectively. This finding is consistent with this type of oxidation reaction because ozone only modifies the organic molecules but does not mineralize them fully leaving residual toxicity of the transformation products. In contrast, the specific receptor-mediated endpoints of inhibition of photosystem II in algae and estrogenicity were largely reduced by ozonation. While compounds inhibiting photosynthesis proved to be rather recalcitrant toward biological treatment with only 47% removal, an additional 86% removal by ozonation yielded an overall treatment efficiency in the entire treatment chain of 89%. The effect on estrogenicity, quantified with the yeast estrogen screen, was even more significant: A treatment efficiency of 95% in the secondary treatment, 86% during ozonation plus a small effect by biological sand filtration yielded an overall treatment efficiency of 99.5%. Insecticides that inhibit acetylcholinesterase were fairly resistant to degradation, but an overall treatment efficiency of 91% was achieved in two steps: 72% in biological treatment and 60% during ozonation. Finally, no significant genotoxicity was observed with the umuC test after ozonation, while the influent showed a genotoxic response when it was enriched by a factor of 15 to 60. Treatment efficiency increased with the ozone dose and remained virtually unchanged over ozone doses above 500 g ozone per kg dissolved organic carbon. The reduction of toxicity can be rationalized by the chemical oxidation processes likely to occur for each group of chemicals that are typical for a given mode of toxic action. For comparison, tertiary treatment with powdered activated carbon was also evaluated, which poses a viable alternative to ozonation with respect to removal of micropollutants.
引用
收藏
页码:1836 / 1846
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Abegglen C., 2009, OZONATION TREATED EF
[2]   Identification of organic compounds and ecotoxicological assessment of sewage treatment plants (STP) effluents [J].
Aguayo, S ;
Muñoz, MJ ;
de la Torre, A ;
Roset, J ;
de la Peña, E ;
Carballo, M .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 328 (1-3) :69-81
[3]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2005.07.024
[4]   Application of ozonation process in industrial wastewaters:: Textile, Kraft E1 and whey effluents [J].
Assalin, MR ;
Almeida, ES ;
Rosa, MA ;
Moraes, SG ;
Duran, N .
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 25 (08) :867-872
[5]   Derivation of an aquatic predicted no-effect concentration for the synthetic hormone, 17α-ethinyl estradiol [J].
Caldwell, Daniel J. ;
Mastrocco, Frank ;
Hutchinson, Thomas H. ;
Laenge, Reinhard ;
Heijerick, Dagobert ;
Janssen, Colin ;
Anderson, Paul D. ;
Sumpter, John P. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 42 (19) :7046-7054
[6]   Evaluation of wastewater reclamation technologies based on in vitro and in vivo bioassays [J].
Cao, Nan ;
Yang, Min ;
Zhang, Yu ;
Hu, Jianying ;
Ike, Michihiko ;
Hirotsuji, Junji ;
Matsui, Hisae ;
Inoue, Daisuke ;
Sei, Kazunari .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 407 (05) :1588-1597
[7]   The cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of surface water and wastewater effluents as determined by bioluminescence, umu-assays and selected biomarkers [J].
Dizer, H ;
Wittekindt, E ;
Fischer, B ;
Hansen, PD .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2002, 46 (02) :225-233
[8]   Oxidation of antibacterial molecules by aqueous ozone: Moiety-specific reaction kinetics and application to ozone-based wastewater treatment [J].
Dodd, MC ;
Buffle, MO ;
Von Gunten, U .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (06) :1969-1977
[9]   Oxidation of Antibacterial Compounds by Ozone and Hydroxyl Radical: Elimination of Biological Activity during Aqueous Ozonation Processes [J].
Dodd, Michael C. ;
Kohler, Hans-Peter E. ;
Von Gunten, Urs .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (07) :2498-2504
[10]   Monitoring of the ecotoxicological hazard potential by polar organic micropollutants in sewage treatment plants and surface waters using a mode-of-action based test battery [J].
Escher, Beate I. ;
Bramaz, Nadine ;
Quayle, Pamela ;
Rutishauser, Sibylle ;
Vermeirssen, Etienne L. M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2008, 10 (05) :622-631