There is safety in power, or power in safety

被引:31
作者
Dekker, Sidney W. A. [1 ,2 ]
Nyce, James M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Safety Sci Innovat Lab, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Ball State Univ, Dept Anthropol, Muncie, IN 47306 USA
关键词
Power; Safety science; Human error; Enlightenment; Safety culture; Social science; MANAGEMENT; RISK; UNCERTAINTY; CULTURE; SENSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.013
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Power and politics are profoundly implicated in organizational accidents. Yet the safety-scientific literature remains relatively uncommitted to a research agenda that would make power a critical category in our understanding of organizational safety. This has consequences for the field's scholarship and for safety praxis. This paper reviews how power in the literature has been elided or treated as an instrumental force where views of reality compete for acceptance and dominance. Despite its recent preoccupation with "safety culture," the literature has only just started embracing power as embodied in discourse or in the legitimated procedures and organizational processes for the production and acceptance of safety. We conclude with suggestions for how such a research agenda might look. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 49
页数:6
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   The everyday experience of living with risk and uncertainty [J].
Alaszewski, Andy ;
Coxon, Kirstie .
HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY, 2008, 10 (05) :413-420
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, What Do You Care What Other People Think
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, RISK SOC NEW MODERNI
[4]  
[Anonymous], HUMAN ORG
[5]  
[Anonymous], HUM FACT ERG SOC 50
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, The Social Construction of What?
[7]  
[Anonymous], LOVE ZERO HUMAN FALL
[8]  
[Anonymous], CONSTRUCTING RISK SA
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1993, The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts