Informed consent: Protection or obstacle? Some emerging issues

被引:21
作者
Ellenberg, SS [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, DIV BIOSTAT & EPIDEMIOL, CTR BIOL EVALUAT & RES, ROCKVILLE, MD 20857 USA
来源
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS | 1997年 / 18卷 / 06期
关键词
informed consent; bioethics; HHS regulations; FDA regulations; randomized consent design; deferred consent; emergency treatment; placebo controls;
D O I
10.1016/S0197-2456(96)00130-4
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
There is widespread consensus on the need for informed consent procedures in medical research. Nevertheless, aspects of the informed consent process remain controversial, and innovative approaches to research may raise new issues and concerns. The randomized consent design for clinical trials, proposed by Zelen (N Engl J Med 1979; 300:1242-1245), permitted physicians to randomize patients without consent, then obtain informed consent from only those patients randomized to the experimental (as opposed to the standard treatment) arm. More recently, the proposal has been made to allow waiver of informed consent for study of patients in emergency circumstances who may be temporarily incapable of providing such consent, and for whom no family member is immediately available to give a ''proxy'' consent (Biros M.H. et al. JAMA 1995; 273:1283-1287). The medical community and federal regulatory policy have responded differently to these proposals. Published by Elsevier Science Inc. 1997.
引用
收藏
页码:628 / 636
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   DEFERRED CONSENT - A NEW APPROACH FOR RESUSCITATION RESEARCH ON COMATOSE PATIENTS [J].
ABRAMSON, NS ;
MEISEL, A ;
SAFAR, P .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1986, 255 (18) :2466-2471
[2]  
*ACT UP TREATM DAT, 1989, 5 INT C AIDS MONTR J
[3]  
ANNAS GJ, 1977, INFOMED CONSENT HUMA
[4]   INFORMED CONSENT IN EMERGENCY RESEARCH - CONSENSUS STATEMENT FROM THE COALITION CONFERENCE OF ACUTE RESUSCITATION AND CRITICAL CARE RESEARCHERS [J].
BIROS, MH ;
LEWIS, RJ ;
OLSON, CM ;
RUNGE, JW ;
CUMMINS, RO ;
FOST, N .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (16) :1283-1287
[5]   DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR AIDS TRIALS [J].
BYAR, DP ;
SCHOENFELD, DA ;
GREEN, SB ;
AMATO, DA ;
DAVIS, R ;
DEGRUTTOLA, V ;
FINKELSTEIN, DM ;
GATSONIS, C ;
GELBER, RD ;
LAGAKOS, S ;
LEFKOPOULOU, M ;
TSIATIS, AA ;
ZELEN, M ;
PETO, J ;
FREEDMAN, LS ;
GAIL, M ;
SIMON, R ;
ELLENBERG, SS ;
ANDERSON, JR ;
COLLINS, R ;
PETO, R ;
PETO, T .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 323 (19) :1343-1348
[6]  
CAPRON AM, 1979, NEW ENGL J MED, V301, P787
[7]   INFORMED CONSENT - WHY ARE ITS GOALS IMPERFECTLY REALIZED [J].
CASSILETH, BR ;
ZUPKIS, RV ;
SUTTONSMITH, K ;
MARCH, V .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1980, 302 (16) :896-900
[8]  
*COUNC INT ORG MED, 1993, INT GUID BIOM RES IN, P13
[9]  
COX EB, 1979, NEW ENGL J MED, V301, P786
[10]   RANDOMIZATION DESIGNS IN COMPARATIVE CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
ELLENBERG, SS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1984, 310 (21) :1404-1408