An inexpensive, simple, and manual method of CD4 T-cell quantitation in HIV-infected individuals for use in developing countries

被引:39
作者
Balakrishnan, P
Dunne, M
Kumarasamy, N
Crowe, S
Subbulakshmi, G
Ganesh, AK
Cecelia, AJ
Roth, P
Mayer, KH
Thyagarajan, SP
Solomon, S
机构
[1] YRG, CARE, Voluntary Hlth Serv, Madras 600113, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Macfarlane Burnet Inst Med Res & Publ Hlth, Clin Res Lab, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Cell Anal Dev Ctr, Biomed Res Div, Miami, FL USA
[4] Brown Univ, Miriam Hosp, Sch Med, Providence, RI USA
[5] Univ Madras, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00126334-200408150-00002
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
CD4(+) T lymphocytes are currently the most common surrogate marker indicating immune status and disease progression with HIV infection. The cost of monitoring disease progression and response to therapy is still prohibitively expensive. Flow cytometry is the gold standard for the estimation of CD4(+), but the high initial investment for this technology and expensive reagents makes it unaffordable for developing countries like India. We evaluated the Coulter cytosphere assay for quantifying CD4(+) T lymphocytes in comparison with the standard method, flow cytometry, in 122 HIV-infected individuals. The correlation coefficient of the cytosphere assay compared with that of flow cytometry for CD4(+) T lymphocytes was 0.97 (P<0.0001), with a confidence interval of 0.95 to 0.98. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the cytosphere assay in enumerating absolute CD4(+) T-lymphocyte counts of less than 200/muL were 94.9%, 96.4%, 92.5%, and 97.6%, respectively. This is a simple inexpensive method and has a strong correlation with flow cytometry. Hence, the cytosphere assay can be an alternate to flow cytometry for the estimation of CD4(+) T-lymphocyte counts, especially in resource-poor settings of developing countries, for monitoring HIV progression and response to therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1006 / 1010
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V41, P1
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   A MANUAL BEAD ASSAY FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ABSOLUTE CD4(+) AND CD8(+) LYMPHOCYTE COUNTS IN HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS-INFECTED INDIVIDUALS [J].
CARELLA, AV ;
MOSS, MW ;
PROVOST, V ;
QUINN, TC .
CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY IMMUNOLOGY, 1995, 2 (05) :623-625
[4]  
*CDCP, 1997, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V46, P1
[5]   IMMUNOLOGICAL ALTERATIONS IN HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS-INFECTION - A REVIEW [J].
DEMARTINI, RM ;
PARKER, JW .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 1989, 3 (01) :56-70
[6]   Comparative assessment of five alternative methods for CD4+ T-lymphocyte enumeration for implementation in developing countries [J].
Didier, JM ;
Kazatchkine, MD ;
Demouchy, C ;
Moat, C ;
Diagbouga, S ;
Sepulveda, C ;
Di Lonardo, AM ;
Weiss, L .
JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2001, 26 (02) :193-195
[7]   THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF CELLULAR AND SEROLOGIC MARKERS IN INFECTION WITH HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS TYPE-1 [J].
FAHEY, JL ;
TAYLOR, JMG ;
DETELS, R ;
HOFMANN, B ;
MELMED, R ;
NISHANIAN, P ;
GIORGI, JV .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 322 (03) :166-172
[8]  
*FOR COLL HIV RES, 2002, RES TRANSF HIV DIAGN
[9]   DETERMINATION OF CD4+ AND CD8+ LYMPHOCYTES WITH THE CYTOSPHERE ASSAY - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY WITH FLOW-CYTOMETRY AND THE IMMUNOALKALINE PHOSPHATASE METHOD [J].
GERNOW, A ;
LISSE, IM ;
BOTTIGER, B ;
CHRISTENSEN, L ;
BRATTEGAARD, K .
CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY, 1995, 76 (02) :135-141
[10]  
Jeyaseelan L, 1992, Natl Med J India, V5, P286