Influence of mating ratio and group size on indicators of fearfulness and stress of hens and cocks

被引:17
作者
Campo, JL [1 ]
Dávila, SG [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nacl Invest Agr & Alimentaria, Dept Genet & Biotecnol, Madrid 28080, Spain
关键词
mating ratio; group size; stress; fear; chicken;
D O I
10.1093/ps/81.8.1099
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The effects of the male to female mating ratio on the heterophil to lymphocyte ratio and duration of tonic immobility (indicators of stress and fearfulness, respectively) were analyzed in two different experiments with different group sizes. In Experiment 1, four different mating ratios (1:11, 1:5, 1:3, and 1:1) and 10 different Spanish breeds of chickens were used; each breeding pen had 12 birds. In Experiment 2, two different mating ratios (1:11 and 1:1) and four breeds were analyzed; 60 birds were used. There were significant differences among mating ratios (P < 0.001) for the heterophil to lymphocyte ratio in females of both group sizes. Hens housed with a mating ratio of 1:1 had higher heterophil to lymphocyte ratios than did hens housed with a 1:11 mating ratio in the group with 12 birds (0.53 vs. 0.35) or that with 60 birds (0.76 vs. 0.37). Hens in a mating ratio of 1:1 had significant heterophilia and lymphopenia (P < 0.001). The 1:5 and 1:3 male to female mating ratios did not differ significantly from the 1:11 mating ratio. The effect of the group size was significant when the mating ratio was 1:1 but not when it was 1:11. There was no significant difference among mating ratios in terms of tonic immobility for hens. Cocks housed with a mating ratio of 1:1 and a group size of 60 birds showed shorter duration of tonic immobility (P < 0.05) than did cocks housed with a 1:11 mating ratio (203 vs. 296 s). The results suggest that very high mating ratios should not be used in conservation populations because it increases physiological and psychological stress responses.
引用
收藏
页码:1099 / 1103
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Statistical Tables
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, P 6 WORLD C GEN APPL
[3]  
Brake J., 1998, Poultry Science, V77, P66
[4]   GENETIC-BASIS OF THE MELANOTIC PRAT PHENOTYPE [J].
CAMPO, JL ;
OROZCO, F .
BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 1986, 27 (03) :361-367
[5]  
CAMPO JL, 1982, 2ND WORLD C GEN APPL, V6, P88
[6]  
Casanovas P., 1999, Poultry Science, V78, P119
[7]  
FUNK EM, 1955, HATCHERY OPERATION M
[8]   TONIC IMMOBILITY AS A MEASURE OF FEAR IN DOMESTIC-FOWL [J].
GALLUP, GG .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1979, 27 (FEB) :316-317
[9]   EVALUATION OF THE HETEROPHIL LYMPHOCYTE RATIO AS A MEASURE OF STRESS IN CHICKENS [J].
GROSS, WB ;
SIEGEL, HS .
AVIAN DISEASES, 1983, 27 (04) :972-979
[10]   SEX AND STRAIN COMPARISONS OF TONIC IMMOBILITY (RIGHTING TIME) IN THE DOMESTIC-FOWL AND THE EFFECTS OF VARIOUS METHODS OF INDUCTION [J].
JONES, RB ;
FAURE, JM .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 1981, 6 (01) :47-55