Improving the power of sib pair quantitative trait loci detection by phenotype winsorization

被引:28
作者
Fernández, JR
Etzel, C
Beasley, TM
Shete, S
Amos, CI
Allison, DB
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Nutr Sci, Div Physiol & Metab, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama, Dept Biostat, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ Alabama, Clin Nutr Res Ctr, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[4] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
winsorizing; quantitative trait loci; sib pairs; statistical power;
D O I
10.1159/000057984
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objectives: In sib pair studies, quantitative trait loci (QTL) identification may be adversely affected by non-normality in the phenotypic distribution, particularly when subjects falling in the tails of the distribution bias the trait mean or variance. We evaluated the robustness and power of reducing the influence of subjects with extreme phenotypic values by Winsorizing non-normal distributions in three versions of Haseman-Elston regression-based methods of QTL linkage analysis. Methods: Data were simulated for normal and non-normal distributions. Phenotypic values that correspond to cutoff points at the omega and 1-omega percentiles of the distribution were identified, and phenotypic values falling outside the boundaries of the omega and 1-omega cutoff points were replaced by the omega and 1-omega values, respectively. One million replications were performed for the three tests of linkage for Winsorized and non-Winsorized data. Results: Winsorization reduced conservatism in the tails of the empirical type I error rate for the vast majority of the tests of linkage, increased the power of QTL detection in non-normal data and created a slight negative bias in symmetrical phenotypic distributions. Conclusions: Winsorizing can improve the power of QTL detection with certain non-normal distributions but can also introduce bias into the estimate of the QTL effect. Copyright (C) 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 67
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Testing the robustness of the likelihood-ratio test in a variance-component quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure [J].
Allison, DB ;
Neale, MC ;
Zannolli, R ;
Schork, NJ ;
Amos, CI ;
Blangero, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1999, 65 (02) :531-544
[2]   Testing the robustness of the new Haseman-Elston quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure [J].
Allison, DB ;
Fernández, JR ;
Heo, M ;
Beasley, TM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2000, 67 (01) :249-252
[3]   Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees [J].
Almasy, L ;
Blangero, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1998, 62 (05) :1198-1211
[4]  
AMOS CI, 1994, AM J HUM GENET, V54, P535
[5]   Assessing genetic linkage and association with robust components of variance approaches [J].
Amos, CI ;
Zhu, DK ;
Boerwinkle, E .
ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1996, 60 :143-160
[6]  
Amos CI, 1997, GENET EPIDEMIOL, V14, P743, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:6<743::AID-GEPI30>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-O
[8]   POWER AND ROBUSTNESS OF SIB-PAIR LINKAGE TESTS AND EXTENSION TO LARGER SIBSHIPS [J].
BLACKWELDER, WC ;
ELSTON, RC .
COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS PART A-THEORY AND METHODS, 1982, 11 (05) :449-484
[9]  
Elston RC, 2000, GENET EPIDEMIOL, V19, P1, DOI 10.1002/1098-2272(200007)19:1<1::AID-GEPI1>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-E