Value of genetic profiling for the prediction of coronary heart disease

被引:38
作者
van der Net, Jeroen B. [1 ,2 ]
Janssens, A. Cecile J. W. [1 ]
Sijbrands, Eric J. G. [2 ]
Steyerberg, Ewout W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-3015 GE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Dept Internal Med, NL-3015 GE Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
ARTERY-DISEASE; COMPLEX DISEASES; ASSOCIATION ANALYSIS; RISK PREDICTION; CANDIDATE GENES; BREAST-CANCER; SUSCEPTIBILITY; PROCAM; METAANALYSIS; CHOLESTEROL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2009.04.022
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Advances in high-throughput genomics facilitate the identification of novel genetic susceptibility variants for coronary heart disease (CHID). This may improve CHID risk prediction. The aim of the present simulation study was to investigate to what degree CHID risk can be predicted by testing multiple genetic variants (genetic profiling). Methods We simulated genetic profiles for a population of 100,000 individuals with a 10-year CHID incidence of 10%. For each combination of model parameters (number of variants, genotype frequency and odds ratio [OR]), we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to indicate the discrimination between individuals who will and will not develop CHID. Results The AUC of genetic profiles could rise to 0.90 when 100 hypothetical variants with ORs of 1.5 and genotype frequencies of 50% were simulated. The AUC of a genetic profile consisting of 10 established variants, with ORs ranging from 1.13 to 1.42, was 0.59. When 2, 5, and 10 times as many identical variants would be identified, the AUCs were 0.63, 0.69, and 0.76. Conclusion To obtain AUCs similar to those of conventional CHID risk predictors, a considerable number of additional common genetic variants need to be identified with preferably strong effects. (Am Heart J 2009; 158:105-10.)
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 110
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, J COMPUT GRAPH STAT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, JAMA, V285, P2486
[3]  
Ash A, 1999, STAT MED, V18, P375, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990228)18:4<375::AID-SIM20>3.3.CO
[4]  
2-A
[5]   Simple scoring scheme for calculating the risk of acute coronary events based on the 10-year follow-up of the Prospective Cardiovascular Munster (PROCAM) study [J].
Assmann, G ;
Cullen, P ;
Schulte, H .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 105 (03) :310-315
[6]   Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction [J].
Cook, Nancy R. .
CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (07) :928-935
[7]   A comparison of the PROCAM and Framingham point-scoring systems for estimation of individual risk of coronary heart disease in the Second Northwick Park Heart Study [J].
Cooper, JA ;
Miller, GJ ;
Humphries, SE .
ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2005, 181 (01) :93-100
[8]   Future use of genomics in coronary artery disease [J].
Damani, Samir B. ;
Topol, Eric J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 50 (20) :1933-1940
[9]   The use of meta-analysis risk estimates for candidate genes in combination to predict coronary heart disease risk [J].
Drenos, F. ;
Whittaker, J. C. ;
Humphries, S. E. .
ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2007, 71 :611-619
[10]   Are the Framingham and PROCAM coronary heart disease risk functions applicable to different European populations?: The PRIME Study [J].
Empana, JP ;
Ducimetière, P ;
Arveiler, D ;
Ferrières, J ;
Evans, A ;
Ruidavets, JB ;
Haas, B ;
Yarnell, J ;
Bingham, A ;
Amouyel, P ;
Dallongeville, J .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (21) :1903-1911