Pragmatic Cosmopolitanism: A Deweyan Approach to Democracy beyond the Nation-State

被引:13
作者
Bray, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
来源
MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES | 2009年 / 37卷 / 03期
关键词
cosmopolitanism; democracy; Dewey; pragmatism; transnational;
D O I
10.1177/0305829809103239
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Contemporary normative debates about democracy beyond nation-states have largely centred on the claims of two broad camps: the 'liberal cosmopolitans' and the 'deliberative democrats'. This article offers an alternative perspective developed from the work of philosopher John Dewey that I call 'pragmatic cosmopolitanism'. First, my argument for pragmatic cosmopolitanism briefly outlines the Deweyan ethical ideas that serve as my, normative grounding for the transnationalisation of democratic life. This grounding is primarily based on an ethic of growth that Sees the use of Critical intelligence and imaginative representation as the key basis for extending moral and political boundaries beyond nation-states. In the second part, I flesh Out this framework by providing normative responses to what I identify as the four problems of transnational democracy: problems of constituency, democratic scope, social prerequisites and practical institutionalisation. These responses focus attention on the important roles of leadership and representation in Constituting the political agency of transnational democratic publics. The role of leaders and representative practices is emphasised because they are central elements in the development of transnational democracy that are neglected by the liberal cosmopolitan and deliberative approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 719
页数:37
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
ACKERLY B, 2006, CONTEMP POLIT THEORY, V5, P126
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS
[3]  
[Anonymous], MILLENNIUM J INT STU
[4]  
[Anonymous], EUROPEAN J INT RELAT
[5]  
[Anonymous], LIBERAL DEMOCRACY
[6]  
ARCHIBUGI D, 1998, REIMAGINING POLITICA, P212
[7]  
ARCHIBUGI D, 2000, GLOBAL DEMOCRACY KEY, P136
[8]  
Bauer Harry., 2009, PRAGMATISM INT RELAT
[9]  
BEETHAM D, 1993, PROSPECTS DEMOCRACY, P57
[10]  
BELLAMY AJ, 2002, MILLENNIUM J INT STU, V31