Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia

被引:346
作者
Culpepper, A. Stanley
Grey, Timothy L.
Vencill, William K.
Kichler, Jeremy M.
Webster, Theodore M.
Brown, Steve M.
York, Alan C.
Davis, Jerry W.
Hanna, Wayne W.
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Tifton, GA 31793 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Tifton, GA 31794 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[4] Univ Georgia, Macon Cty Extens Serv, Oglethorpe, GA 31068 USA
[5] USDA ARS, Crop Protect & Management Res Unit, Coastal Plain Expt Stn, Tifton, GA 31794 USA
[6] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Crop Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[7] Univ Georgia, Griffin, GA 30223 USA
关键词
absorption; glyphosate resistance; herbicide resistance; resistance mechanism; translocation; weed resistance;
D O I
10.1614/WS-06-001R.1
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth biotype was confirmed in central Georgia. In the field, glyphosate applied to 5- to 13-cm-tall Palmer amaranth at three times the normal use rate of 0.84 kg ae ha(-1) controlled this biotype only 17%. The biotype was controlled 82% by glyphosate at 12 times the normal use rate. In the greenhouse, I-50 values (rate necessary for 50% inhibition) for visual control and shoot fresh weight, expressed as percentage of the nontreated, were 8 and 6.2 times greater, respectively, with the resistant biotype compared with a known glyphosate-susceptible biotype. Glyphosate absorption and translocation and the number of chromosomes did not differ between biotypes. Shikimate was detected in leaf tissue of the susceptible biotype treated with glyphosate but not in the resistant biotype.
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 626
页数:7
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   THE SITE OF THE INHIBITION OF THE SHIKIMATE PATHWAY BY GLYPHOSATE .2. INTERFERENCE OF GLYPHOSATE WITH CHORISMATE FORMATION INVIVO AND INVITRO [J].
AMRHEIN, N ;
DEUS, B ;
GEHRKE, P ;
STEINRUCKEN, HC .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 66 (05) :830-834
[2]   Cloransulam absorption, translocation, and efficacy on common broadleaf weed species [J].
Barnes, JW ;
Oliver, LR .
WEED SCIENCE, 2004, 52 (04) :634-641
[3]   Glyphosate interaction with manganese in tank mixtures and its effect on glyphosate absorption and translocation [J].
Bernards, ML ;
Thelen, KD ;
Penner, D ;
Muthukumaran, RB ;
McCracken, JL .
WEED SCIENCE, 2005, 53 (06) :787-794
[4]   Perspectives on glyphosate resistance [J].
Bradshaw, LD ;
Padgette, SR ;
Kimball, SL ;
Wells, BH .
WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 11 (01) :189-198
[5]  
Bunnell BT, 2003, WEED TECHNOL, V17, P550, DOI 10.1614/0890-037X(2003)017[0550:DROFBP]2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
Culpepper A. S., 1998, J COTTON SCI, V2, P174
[8]  
Elmore C.D, 1990, Weed Identification Guide
[9]  
Everitt J. D., 2003, P BELTW COTT C NASHV, P2262
[10]   Investigations into glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis):: retention, uptake, translocation, and metabolism [J].
Feng, PCC ;
Tran, M ;
Chiu, T ;
Sammons, RD ;
Heck, GR ;
CaJacob, CA .
WEED SCIENCE, 2004, 52 (04) :498-505