Isolation from mammalian predators differentially affects two congeners

被引:89
作者
Blumstein, DT
Daniel, JC
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Organism Biol Ecol & Evolut, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Macquarie Univ, Cooperat Res Ctr Conservat & Management Marsupial, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
关键词
group size effects; habitat selection; macropod antipredator behavior; Macropus eugenii; Macropus fuliginosus; relaxed selection; tammar wallabies; time allocation; vigilance; western gray kangaroos;
D O I
10.1093/beheco/13.5.657
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Evolutionary isolation from predators can profoundly influence the morphology, physiology, and behavior of prey, but little is known about how species respond to the loss of only some of their predators. We studied antipredator behavior of tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) and western gray kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus) on Kangaroo Island (KI), South Australia, and at Tutanning Nature Reserve on the mainland of western Australia. Both species on KI have been isolated from native mammalian predators for several thousand years. On KI, wallabies (because of their size) are vulnerable to diurnal aerial predators. In contrast, on the mainland both species have been exposed continuously to native and introduced mammalian and avian predators. At both locations, wallabies modified the amount of time they allocated to vigilance and foraging in response to group size, whereas kangaroos did so only at the higher risk Tutanning site. Both species modified overall time budgets (they were warier at the higher risk site), and both species modified space-use patterns as a function of risk. At the higher risk site, tammars were closer to cover, whereas kangaroos were, on average, farther from cover. We hypothesize that the presence of a single predator, even if it is active at a different time of day, may profoundly affect the way a species responds to the loss of other predators by maintaining certain antipredator behaviors. Such an effect of ancestral predators may be expected as long as species encounter some predators.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 663
页数:7
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
*AB CONC, 1991, SUPERANOVA
[2]  
[Anonymous], KANGAROOS WALLABIES
[3]  
[Anonymous], MAMMALS AUSTR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, 1996 ACTION PLAN AUS
[5]  
ARCHER M, 1981, ECOLOGICAL BIOGEOGRA, P1436
[6]   Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antipredator vigilance [J].
Bednekoff, PA ;
Lima, SL .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1998, 13 (07) :284-287
[7]   VIGILANCE, FLOCK SIZE, AND FLOCK GEOMETRY - INFORMATION GATHERING BY WESTERN EVENING GROSBEAKS (AVES, FRINGILLIDAE) [J].
BEKOFF, M .
ETHOLOGY, 1995, 99 (02) :150-161
[8]  
Berger J, 1998, BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, P80
[9]   PRONGHORN FORAGING ECONOMY AND PREDATOR AVOIDANCE IN A DESERT ECOSYSTEM - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE CONSERVATION OF LARGE MAMMALIAN HERBIVORES [J].
BERGER, J ;
DANEKE, D ;
JOHNSON, J ;
BERWICK, SH .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1983, 25 (03) :193-208
[10]  
BLANCHARD DC, 1990, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V16, P165