Technical feasibility, safety, and clinical outcome of stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery bifurcation narrowing

被引:48
作者
Park, SJ [1 ]
Lee, CW [1 ]
Kim, YH [1 ]
Lee, JH [1 ]
Hong, MK [1 ]
Kim, JJ [1 ]
Park, SW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Dept Med, Asan Med Ctr, Songpa Gu, Seoul 138736, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02492-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This study was performed to evaluate the acute and long-term results of stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) bifurcation lesions. Sixty-three consecutive patients with an unprotected LMCA bifurcation lesion and normal left ventricular function were included. Stenting was performed with (n = 32) or without debulking atherectomy (n = 31) at the operator's discretion. Slotted-tube stents, coil stents, or bifurcation stents were used. The procedural success rate was 1005/o. In-hospital events including stent thrombosis, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and emergency bypass surgery did not occur in any patients. The angiographic follow-up rate was 86% (43 of the 50 eligible patients), and the restenosis rate was 28% (parent vessel only 14%, side branch only 9%, and both 5%). Restenosis at the parent vessel occurred less frequently in the debulking group than in the nondebulking group (5% vs 33%, respectively, p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, the clebulking procedure was an independent predictive factor of restenosis for the parent vessel (odds ratio 0.10, 95% confidence intervals 0.01 to 0.91, p = 0.04). Clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients at 19.9 +/- 13.7 months. There were 2 deaths (noncardiac origin), but no myocardial infarction during follow-up. Target lesion revascularization was required in 6 patients. The event-free survival rate (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization) was 86% at the end of the follow-up period. In conclusion, stenting for an unprotected LMCA bifurcation lesion may be performed with a high procedural success rate and a favorable clinical outcome in selected patients with normal left ventricular function, suggesting that stenting would be an effective alternative to surgery in these patients. (C) 2002 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 378
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   SIDE BRANCH OCCLUSION DURING CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY - INCIDENCE, ANGIOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS, AND OUTCOME [J].
ARORA, RR ;
RAYMOND, RE ;
DIMAS, AP ;
BHADWAR, K ;
SIMPFENDORFER, C .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1989, 18 (04) :210-212
[2]   DIRECTIONAL ATHERECTOMY VERSUS BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY FOR CORONARY OSTIAL AND NONOSTIAL LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY-ARTERY LESIONS - RESULTS FROM A RANDOMIZED MULTICENTER TRIAL [J].
BOEHRER, JD ;
ELLIS, SG ;
PIEPER, K ;
HOLMES, DR ;
KEELER, GP ;
DEBOWEY, D ;
CHAPEKIS, AT ;
LEYA, F ;
MOONEY, MR ;
GOTTLIEB, RS ;
SERRUYS, PW ;
CALIFF, RM ;
TOPOL, EJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1995, 25 (06) :1380-1386
[3]   KISSING STENTS FOR BIFURCATIONAL CORONARY LESION [J].
COLOMBO, A ;
GAGLIONE, A ;
NAKAMURA, S ;
FINCI, L .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1993, 30 (04) :327-330
[4]   Mechanical debulking versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of true bifurcation lesions [J].
Dauerman, HL ;
Higgins, PJ ;
Sparano, AM ;
Gibson, CM ;
Garber, GR ;
Carrozza, JP ;
Kuntz, RE ;
Laham, RJ ;
Shubrooks, SJ ;
Baim, DS ;
Cohen, DJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 32 (07) :1845-1852
[5]   RESULTS OF PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY OF THE LEFT MAIN CORONARY-ARTERY [J].
ELDAR, M ;
SCHULHOFF, N ;
HERZ, I ;
FRANKEL, R ;
FELD, H ;
SHANI, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1991, 68 (02) :255-256
[6]  
Fort S, 1996, CAN J CARDIOL, V12, P678
[7]  
Kimura T, 1997, CIRCULATION, V96, P475
[8]   Initial and long-term results of angioplasty in unprotected left main coronary artery [J].
Kosuga, K ;
Tamai, H ;
Ueda, K ;
Hsu, YS ;
Kawashima, A ;
Tanaka, S ;
Matsui, S ;
Hata, T ;
Minami, M ;
Nakamura, T ;
Toma, M ;
Motohara, S ;
Uehata, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 83 (01) :32-37
[9]  
Laham RJ, 1996, CATHETER CARDIO DIAG, V37, P77
[10]  
Lefèvre T, 2000, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V49, P274, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(200003)49:3<274::AID-CCD11>3.0.CO