A Randomized Trial Comparing Acupuncture, Simulated Acupuncture, and Usual Care for Chronic Low Back Pain

被引:291
作者
Cherkin, Daniel C. [1 ]
Sherman, Karen J. [1 ]
Avins, Andrew L. [2 ]
Erro, Janet H. [1 ]
Ichikawa, Laura [1 ]
Barlow, William E. [1 ,3 ]
Delaney, Kristin [1 ]
Hawkes, Rene [1 ]
Hamilton, Luisa [2 ]
Pressman, Alice [2 ]
Khalsa, Partap S. [4 ]
Deyo, Richard A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hlth Studies, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[2] No Calif Kaiser Permanente, Div Res, Oakland, CA USA
[3] Canc Res & Biostat, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Natl Ctr Complementary & Alternat Med, Div Extramural Res & Training, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
[5] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Family Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
EXPENDITURES; PATTERNS; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1001/archinternmed.2009.65
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Acupuncture is a popular complementary and alternative treatment for chronic back pain. Recent European trials suggest similar short-term benefits from real and sham acupuncture needling. This trial addresses the importance of needle placement and skin penetration in eliciting acupuncture effects for patients with chronic low back pain. Methods: A total of 638 adults with chronic mechanical low back pain were randomized to individualized acupuncture, standardized acupuncture, simulated acupuncture, or usual care. Ten treatments were provided over 7 weeks by experienced acupuncturists. The primary outcomes were back-related dysfunction (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire score; range, 0-23) and symptom bothersomeness (0-10 scale). Outcomes were assessed at baseline and after 8, 26, and 52 weeks. Results: At 8 weeks, mean dysfunction scores for the individualized, standardized, and simulated acupuncture groups improved by 4.4, 4.5, and 4.4 points, respectively, compared with 2.1 points for those receiving usual care (P < .001). Participants receiving real or simulated acupuncture were more likely than those receiving usual care to experience clinically meaningful improvements on the dysfunction scale (60% vs 39%; P < .001). Symptoms improved by 1.6 to 1.9 points in the treatment groups compared with 0.7 points in the usual care group (P < .001). After 1 year, participants in the treatment groups were more likely than those receiving usual care to experience clinically meaningful improvements in dysfunction (59% to 65% vs 50%, respectively; P=.02) but not in symptoms (P > .05). Conclusions: Although acupuncture was found effective for chronic low back pain, tailoring needling sites to each patient and penetration of the skin appear to be unimportant in eliciting therapeutic benefits. These findings raise questions about acupuncture's purported mechanisms of action. It remains unclear whether acupuncture or our simulated method of acupuncture provide physiologically important stimulation or represent placebo or nonspecific effects.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 866
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Vital Health Stat 10, P1
[2]  
Barnes Patricia M, 2004, Adv Data, P1
[3]  
Birch Stephen., 1999, UNDERSTANDING ACUPUN
[5]  
Brinkhaus B, 2006, ARCH INTERN MED, V166, P450
[6]  
Cherkin Daniel C, 2002, J Am Board Fam Pract, V15, P463
[7]   Efficacy of acupuncture for chronic low back pain: protocol for a randomized controlled trial [J].
Cherkin, Daniel C. ;
Sherman, Karen J. ;
Hogeboom, Charissa J. ;
Erro, Janet H. ;
Barlow, William E. ;
Deyo, Richard A. ;
Avins, Andrew L. .
TRIALS, 2008, 9 (1)
[8]   Predicting poor outcomes for back pain seen in primary care using patients' own criteria [J].
Cherkin, DC ;
Deyo, RA ;
Street, JH ;
Barlow, W .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (24) :2900-2907
[9]   Randomized trial comparing traditional Chinese medical acupuncture, therapeutic massage, and self-care education for chronic low back pain [J].
Cherkin, DC ;
Eisenberg, D ;
Sherman, KJ ;
Barlow, W ;
Kaptchuk, TJ ;
Street, J ;
Deyo, RA .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 161 (08) :1081-1088
[10]   AN EVALUATION OF INTERNAL-MAMMARY-ARTERY LIGATION BY A DOUBLE-BLIND TECHNIC [J].
COBB, LA ;
THOMAS, GI ;
DILLARD, DH ;
MERENDINO, KA ;
BRUCE, RA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1959, 260 (22) :1115-1118