An audit over 2 years' practice of open and laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy at renal transplant centres in the UK and Ireland

被引:19
作者
Brook, NR [1 ]
Nicholson, ML [1 ]
机构
[1] Leicester Gen Hosp, Univ Dept Surg, Div Transplantat, Leicester LE5 4PW, Leics, England
关键词
nephrectomy; live donor; laparoscopic; open donor; audit; renal transplantation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2003.04775.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To collate information on the practice of live-donor nephrectomy and compare this with the published British Transplantation Society (BTS) guidelines for best practice, using two questionnaires sent to all renal transplant centres in the UK and Ireland to cover practice for the years 2000 and 2002. METHODS A postal questionnaire was sent to all surgical kidney transplant consultants in the UK and Ireland, including questions on the practice of live-donor nephrectomy in the year 2000 (the questionnaire was sent in 2001) and 2002 (questionnaire sent in 2003). RESULTS All 28 centres responded fully for both years; 27 centres used live kidney donation in 2000, decreasing to 24 in 2002. Consultants reported 356 operations in 2000, representing 19% of all kidney transplants, and 403 in 2002, representing 23% of all kidney transplants. Three centres offered laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in 2000, and five did so in 2002. Most centres organize donor and recipient operations synchronously, and most have a consultant anaesthetist present for the donor procedure. There were variations in the use of analgesia and thromboprophylaxis, and in donor follow-up. CONCLUSIONS There is widespread application of live-donor nephrectomy in the UK but BTS guidelines are not closely followed. Minimal access donor nephrectomy is offered at a few centres but many have plans to introduce this into their practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1031
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: The experience of the inexperienced [J].
Batler, RA ;
Schoor, RA ;
Gonzalez, CM ;
Engel, JD ;
Nadler, RB .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2001, 15 (05) :513-516
[2]   Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A comparison with the conventional open approach [J].
Brown, SL ;
Biehl, TR ;
Rawlins, MC ;
Hefty, TR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (03) :766-769
[3]  
*BTS, 2000, UK GUID LIV KIDN TRA
[4]  
Chan D Y, 1999, Curr Opin Urol, V9, P219, DOI 10.1097/00042307-199905000-00005
[5]   Renal physiology - Laparoscopic considerations [J].
Dunn, MD ;
McDougall, EM .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 27 (04) :609-+
[6]   Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy [J].
Fabrizio, MD ;
Ratner, LE ;
Montgomery, RA ;
Kavoussi, LR .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1999, 26 (01) :247-+
[7]   A survey:: The prevalence of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at large US transplant centers [J].
Finelli, FC ;
Góngora, E ;
Sasaki, TM ;
Light, JA .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 71 (12) :1862-1864
[8]   Laparoscopic retroperitoneal live donor right nephrectomy for purposes of allotransplantation and autotransplantation [J].
Gill, IS ;
Uzzo, RG ;
Hobart, MG ;
Streem, SB ;
Goldfarb, DA ;
Noble, MJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (05) :1500-1504
[9]   Influence of cold-storage conditions on renal function of autotransplanted large pig kidneys [J].
Goujon, JM ;
Vandewalle, A ;
Baumert, H ;
Carretier, M ;
Hauet, T .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 58 (02) :838-850
[10]   Minimally invasive retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Point of technique [J].
Hemal, AK ;
Singh, I .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2001, 11 (05) :341-343