Hemispheric asymmetry of surround inhibition in the human motor system

被引:28
作者
Shin, Hae-Won [1 ,3 ]
Sohn, Young H. [1 ,2 ]
Hallett, Mark [4 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Brain Res Inst, Dept Neurol, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Brain Korea Project Med Sci 21, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[3] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Neurol,Parkinson & Alzheimer Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[4] NINDS, Human Motor Control Sect, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
Handedness; TMS; Motor cortex; Inhibition; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; HUMAN HANDEDNESS; HAND PREFERENCE; INTRACORTICAL INHIBITION; CORTEX; REPRESENTATION; MUSCLE; INDEPENDENCE; DIGITS; CONNECTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinph.2009.02.004
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Surround inhibition (SI) in the motor system is an essential mechanism for the selective execution of desired movements. To investigate the relationship between the efficiency of SI operation in the motor system and handedness, we performed a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study in 10 healthy, right-handed volunteers. Methods: TMS was set to be triggered by self-initiated flexion of the index finger at different intervals ranging from 3 to 1000 ms. Average motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes obtained from self-triggered TMS were normalized to average MEPs of the control TMS at rest and expressed as a percentage. Normalized MEP amplitudes of the adductor digiti minimi (ADM) and the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) muscles were compared between the dominant and non-dominant hands. Results: During index finger flexion, MEP amplitudes of the ADM in the dominant hand were suppressed but not in the non-dominant hand, while MEP amplitudes of the FDS were comparably enhanced in both hands. F-wave amplitudes of ADM were comparably enhanced during index finger flexion in both hands. Conclusion: These results suggest that the functional operation of SI in the motor system is more efficient in the dominant hand than the non-dominant hand. More efficient SI in the dominant hand could lead to greater dexterity in the dominant hand. Significance: Hemispheric asymmetry of SI might be able to serve as a neurophysiological proxy for handedness. (C) 2009 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:816 / 819
页数:4
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Postnatal development of interhemispheric asymmetry in the cytoarchitectuve of human area 4 [J].
Amunts, K ;
SchmidtPassos, F ;
Schleicher, A ;
Zilles, K .
ANATOMY AND EMBRYOLOGY, 1997, 196 (05) :393-402
[2]   Asymmetry in the human motor cortex and handedness [J].
Amunts, K ;
Schlaug, G ;
Schleicher, A ;
Steinmetz, H ;
Dabringhaus, A ;
Roland, PE ;
Zilles, K .
NEUROIMAGE, 1996, 4 (03) :216-222
[3]  
Cicinelli P, 1997, MUSCLE NERVE, V20, P535, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199705)20:5<535::AID-MUS1>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-A
[5]   Hemispheric asymmetries of cortico-cortical connections in human hand motor areas [J].
Civardi, C ;
Cavalli, A ;
Naldi, P ;
Varrasi, C ;
Cantello, R .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 111 (04) :624-629
[6]   Multimodal output mapping of human central motor representation on different spatial scales [J].
Classen, J ;
Knorr, U ;
Werhahn, KJ ;
Schlaug, G ;
Kunesch, E ;
Cohen, LG ;
Seitz, RJ ;
Benecke, R .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1998, 512 (01) :163-179
[7]   Quantifying the independence of human finger movements:: Comparisons of digits, hands, and movement frequencies [J].
Häger-Ross, C ;
Schieber, MH .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 20 (22) :8542-8550
[8]   Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals asymmetrical efficacy of intracortical circuits in primary motor cortex [J].
Hammond, G ;
Faulkner, D ;
Byrnes, M ;
Mastaglia, F ;
Thickbroom, G .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 155 (01) :19-23
[9]   Correlates of human handedness in primary motor cortex: a review and hypothesis [J].
Hammond, G .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2002, 26 (03) :285-292
[10]   Subtle hemispheric asymmetry of motor cortical inhibitory tone [J].
Ilic, TV ;
Jung, P ;
Ziemann, U .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 115 (02) :330-340